Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465317›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2023

Quality of prenatal and postpartum telehealth visits during COVID-19 and preferences for future care.

Cassondra Marshall, Sirena Gutierrez, Hannah Hecht, Rachel Logan, Jennifer Kerns, Nadia Diamond-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Healthcare delivery in the arctic-telehealth prospects.International journal of circumpolar health · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Telehealth in the Prenatal and Postpartum Periods.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cassondra MarshallSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (Dr Marshall and Ms Hecht).
Sirena GutierrezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Ms Gutierrez and Dr Diamond-Smith).
Hannah HechtSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (Dr Marshall and Ms Hecht).
Rachel LoganDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Dr Logan).
Jennifer KernsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Dr Kerns).
Nadia Diamond-SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Ms Gutierrez and Dr Diamond-Smith).
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Developing a Primary Care Intervention to Support Reproductive Decision-Making among Black and Latina Women of Reproductive Age with Type 2 DiabetesK01MD016169 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MARSHALL, CASSONDRA · 2021 to 2025
$685k
NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD016169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth practices for pregnancy-related care were rapidly implemented. Telehealth for pregnancy-related care is likely to continue after the pandemic. In order for health systems and clinicians to provide person-centered pregnancy-related care via telehealth, it is critical to understand patients' telehealth experiences and their preferences regarding the use of telehealth moving forward.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe perceived quality of prenatal and postpartum telehealth visits during COVID-19 and to examine the association between telehealth quality during the pandemic and future telehealth preferences. STUDY

designWe used data from of an online sample of US women aged 18 to 45 years seeking reproductive health care during COVID-19. Two cross-sections of survey data were collected in July 2020 and January 2021. This analysis included those who sought prenatal (n=1496) or postpartum (n=482) care during the pandemic. Among those who had a prenatal or postpartum telehealth visit, we used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between a measure of perceived telehealth quality and openness to future telehealth visits, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsA total of 57.5% of prenatal and 52.9% of postpartum respondents had a telehealth appointment. Respondents agreed with most statements about the quality of their telehealth appointments, with ≥80% reporting that they were convenient, easy, safe, and provided good information. Lower-ranked quality items were related to visits feeling personal and the patient feeling cared for. A total of 35.2% of prenatal (n=816) and 43.3% of postpartum (n=231) respondents expressed openness to telehealth visits in the future. Prenatal and postpartum respondents reporting higher telehealth quality had increased odds of being open to telehealth in the future (prenatal: adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.3; postpartum: adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3).

conclusionPrenatal and postpartum respondents with better telehealth experiences were more likely to express openness to telehealth in the future, although most preferred future in-person visits. As pregnancy-related telehealth continues, it is important to offer appointment options that match patient preferences, especially populations that face barriers in access to care, and to explore ways to personalize care and support positive patient-provider relationships.

Indexed as

antenatal careCOVID-19pandemicpatient-centered careperinatal careprovider–patient relationshipstelemedicinevirtual care

Identifiers

PMID36465317
PMCPMC9699818
OpenAlexW4309990750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.