ArticleCureus2022
Comparison of the Effects of Regular Periods of Immobilization and Prolonged Immobilization on Hand Function Post Distal Radial Fracture.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cast immobilization duration for distal radius fractures, a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of limited forearm rotation following conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a retrospective comparative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common orthopedic cases managed in the emergency room. DRF treatment is either non-operative or operative. Regardless of the treatment methodology, a period of immobilization of 4-6 weeks is required. Purpose The study aims to evaluate hand function for patients who sustained DRF with different immobilization periods in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, National Guard Hospital - Jeddah (NGHA) from December 2016 until December 2019. Materials and methods This is a retrospective cohort study where we collected data of DRF patients managed in NGHA. Data was collected directly from NGHA medical records (December 2016-December 2019). A total of 44 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups; a group that was immobilized as per protocol (six weeks) and a group that deviated from protocol and immobilization exceeded six weeks. A data collection sheet included the patient's demographics, history, fracture description, management method, and hand function measurements. Results Of the 44 participants, 24 (54%) deviated from protocol; the remaining 20 (46%) were immobilized as per protocol. The prolonged immobilization group had limitations in hand function, restriction in extension (P-value = 0.641), and a decrease in grip strength (P-value = 0.291) compared to the per-protocol group. Flexion and radial deviation were affected similarly in both groups. Conclusion Although the results were not significant, immobilization for more than six weeks is associated with decreased hand function, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and higher pain scores based on occupational therapy (OT) measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.