ArticleAging and disease2022
Targeting Sclerostin and Dkk1 at Optimized Proportions of Low-Dose Antibody Achieves Similar Skeletal Benefits to Higher-Dose Sclerostin Targeting in the Mature Adult and Aged Skeleton.
Article in Aging and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone anabolic effects of tibial loading in combination with dual sclerostin and Dkk1 antibodies in aged mice.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Osteocytes in the Metastatic Bone Niche: Mechanistic Pathways and Therapeutic Targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A beneficial effect of a novel DKK1 monoclonal antibody and its sequential alendronate on bone and muscle properties of orchiectomized mice.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in carcinogenesis and cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Sostdc1 Suppression in the Absence of Sclerostin Potentiates Anabolic Action of Cortical Bone in Mice.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Age-associated low bone mass disease is a growing problem in the US. Development of osteoanabolic therapies for treating skeletal fragility has lagged behind anti-catabolic therapies, but several bone-building molecules are clinically available. We reported previously that antibody-based neutralization of the Lrp5/Lrp6 inhibitor Dkk1 has minimal effects on bone gain, but can potentiate the already potent osteoanabolic effects of sclerostin inhibition (another Lrp5/Lrp6 inhibitor highly expressed by osteocytes). In this communication, we test whether an optimized ratio of sclerostin and Dkk1 antibodies (Scl-mAb and Dkk1-mAb, respectively), administered at low doses, can maintain the same bone-building effects as higher dose Scl-mAb, in adult (6 months of age) and aged (20 months of age) wild-type mice. A 3:1 dose of Scl-mAb:Dkk1-mAb at 12.5 mg/kg was equally efficacious as 25 mg/kg of Scl-mAb in both age groups, using radiographic (DXA, µCT), biomechanical, (3-point bending tests), and histological (fluorochrome-based bone formation parameters) outcome measures. For some bone properties, including trabecular thickness and bone mineral density in the spine, and endocortical bone formation rates in the femur, the 3:1 treatment was associated with significantly improved skeletal properties compared to twice the dose of Scl-mAb. Cortical porosity in aged mice was also reduced by both Scl-mAb and low-dose 3:1 treatment. Overall, both treatments were efficacious in the mature adult (6 mo.) and aged (20 mo.) skeletons, suggesting Wnt targeting is a viable strategy for improving skeletal fragility in the very old. Further, the data suggest that low dose of combination therapy can be at least equally efficacious as higher doses of Scl-mAb monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.