Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465155›Full record

ArticleOccupational health science2023

"Are We Working (Too) Comfortably?": Understanding the Nature of and Factors Associated with Sedentary Behaviour When Working in the Home Environment.

Ailsa Niven, Graham Baker, Eva Coral Almeida, Samantha G Fawkner, Ruth Jepson, Jillian Manner, Sarah Morton, Glenna Nightingale, Divya Sivaramakrishnan, Claire Fitzsimons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational health science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ailsa NivenPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-4118-7460
Graham BakerPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Eva Coral AlmeidaPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Samantha G FawknerPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Ruth JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research & Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Jillian MannerPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Sarah MortonPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Glenna NightingaleScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research & Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Divya SivaramakrishnanScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research & Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Claire FitzsimonsPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home working has increased due to COVID-19, but little is known about how this change has impacted the health risk behaviour of elevated sedentary time. The aim of this cross-sectional exploratory study was to assess occupational sitting behaviour when working at home, and use the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to identify influences on this behaviour. University staff (n = 267; 69% female; 92% white) who were predominantly working from home completed a questionnaire to assess sitting time, sitting breaks, demographic and occupational characteristics, and a 7-item COM-B questionnaire and open-ended questions to assess influences on time spent sitting whilst working from home. Data were analysed descriptively, a repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine differences in the COM-B items, and binary logistic regression was used to examine predictors of sitting time. Staff spent on average 89.5% (SD = 17.1) of their time sitting whilst working at home, and took an average of 1.36 (1.38) sitting breaks per hour. There were significant and meaningful differences in the influence of the COM factors on ability and willingness to reduce sitting behaviour (p < .0001; η

Indexed as

Intervention developmentOccupationalSitting behaviour

Identifiers

PMID36465155
PMCPMC9708134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.