Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36465146›Full record

ArticleJournal of intelligent information systems2022

An image and text-based multimodal model for detecting fake news in OSN's.

Santosh Kumar Uppada, Parth Patel, Sivaselvan B

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intelligent information systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santosh Kumar UppadaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IIITDM Kancheepuram, Melakottiyur, Chennai, 600127 Tamil Nadu India.
Parth PatelDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IIITDM Kancheepuram, Melakottiyur, Chennai, 600127 Tamil Nadu India.
Sivaselvan BDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, IIITDM Kancheepuram, Melakottiyur, Chennai, 600127 Tamil Nadu India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital Mass Media has become the new paradigm of communication that revolves around online social networks. The increase in the utilization of online social networks (OSNs) as the primary source of information and the increase of online social platforms providing such news has increased the scope of spreading fake news. People spread fake news in multimedia formats like images, audio, and video. Visual-based news is prone to have a psychological impact on the users and is often misleading. Therefore, Multimodal frameworks for detecting fake posts have gained demand in recent times. This paper proposes a framework that flags fake posts with Visual data embedded with text. The proposed framework works on data derived from the Fakeddit dataset, with over 1 million samples containing text, image, metadata, and comments data gathered from a wide range of sources, and tries to exploit the unique features of fake and legitimate images. The proposed framework has different architectures to learn visual and linguistic models from the post individually. Image polarity datasets, derived from Flickr, are also considered for analysis, and the features extracted from these visual and text-based data helped in flagging news. The proposed fusion model has achieved an overall accuracy of 91.94%, Precision of 93.43%, Recall of 93.07%, and F1-score of 93%. The experimental results show that the proposed Multimodality model with Image and Text achieves better results than other state-of-art models working on a similar dataset.

Indexed as

Bert + DenseClick-baitsError level analysisFakedditFake news detectionFusion modelsVisual sentiment analysisXception

Identifiers

PMID36465146
PMCPMC9708513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.