Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36464813›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Validity and reliability of an android device for the assessment of fall risk in older adult inmates.

Enrique J Vera-Remartínez, Rocío Lázaro-Monge, Sofía V Casado-Hoces, Elena Garcés-Pina, María Pilar Molés-Julio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of a gait training program with the FisiorBMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. FallskipGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrique J Vera-RemartínezPenitentiary Center of Castelló I, Castelló, Spain.
Rocío Lázaro-MongePenitentiary Center of Castelló I, Castelló, Spain.
Sofía V Casado-HocesPenitentiary Center of Madrid III, Madrid, Spain.
Elena Garcés-PinaPenitentiary Center of Zuera, Zaragoza, Spain.
María Pilar Molés-JulioPredemartmental Unit of Nursing, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8954-480X
Federal Penitentiary Service · RUUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo validate the Android device, FallSkip, as a tool to assess the fallers in older adult inmates.

designA cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study.

methodsFor the validation of the FallSkip, the diagnostic criterion used was the risk of having suffered a fall during the last year.

resultsThe results for the FallSkip tool were as follows: sensitivity 60.7%; specificity 83.0%; positive predictive value 65.4%; negative predictive value 80.0%; accuracy 75.3%. In total, 32.1% of participants were found to be at high risk of falls, 23.5% were at mild risk and 7.4% were found to have no risk.

conclusionThe FallSkip device is shown to be a very suitable tool for fall risk assessment. The sample studied presented a statistically significant percentage of fall risk, which made it necessary to carry out interventions through physical activities to improve balance and stability.

Indexed as

Risk FactorsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessmentfallsolder personprisonsvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID36464813
PMCPMC10077384
OpenAlexW4310672788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.