Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36464791›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Strength of Attentional Modulation on Cortical Auditory Evoked Responses Correlates with Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Jae-Hee Lee, Hwan Shim, Bruce Gantz, Inyong Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spectral Grouping of Electrically Encoded Sound Predicts Speech-in-Noise Performance in Cochlear Implantees.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jae-Hee LeeDept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Hwan ShimDept. Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology, 6925Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Bruce GantzDept. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Inyong ChoiDept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-9152
University of Iowa · USRochester Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Inyong Choi · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
Research Training Program in OtolaryngologyT32DC000040 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R · 1993 to 2025
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory selective attention is a crucial top-down cognitive mechanism for understanding speech in noise. Cochlear implant (CI) users display great variability in speech-in-noise performance that is not easily explained by peripheral auditory profile or demographic factors. Thus, it is imperative to understand if auditory cognitive processes such as selective attention explain such variability. The presented study directly addressed this question by quantifying attentional modulation of cortical auditory responses during an attention task and comparing its individual differences with speech-in-noise performance. In our attention experiment, participants with CI were given a pre-stimulus visual cue that directed their attention to either of two speech streams and were asked to select a deviant syllable in the target stream. The two speech streams consisted of the female voice saying "Up" five times every 800 ms and the male voice saying "Down" four times every 1 s. The onset of each syllable elicited distinct event-related potentials (ERPs). At each syllable onset, the difference in the amplitudes of ERPs between the two attentional conditions (attended - ignored) was computed. This ERP amplitude difference served as a proxy for attentional modulation strength. Our group-level analysis showed that the amplitude of ERPs was greater when the syllable was attended than ignored, exhibiting that attention modulated cortical auditory responses. Moreover, the strength of attentional modulation showed a significant correlation with speech-in-noise performance. These results suggest that the attentional modulation of cortical auditory responses may provide a neural marker for predicting CI users' success in clinical tests of speech-in-noise listening.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAuditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleSpeechattentional modulationauditory selective attentioncochlear implantscortical auditory evoked responsesevent-related potentialspeech-in-noise

Identifiers

PMID36464791
PMCPMC9726851
OpenAlexW4310938173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.