ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
A new modified obstetric early warning score for prognostication of severe maternal morbidity.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Concept Analysis of the Dynamics of Risk, Midwifery Agency and the Maternity Early Warning Tool.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Use of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in emergency triage for pregnant trauma patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study on a tool for early hospitalization decision-making.Journal of trauma and injury · 2026Article
- Maternal early warning system (MEWS) model for predicting and reducing severe maternal outcomes in Ethiopia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Early warning systems to predict severe complications during preterm and postpartum: A scoping review.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Article
- Obstetric-specific compared to general early warning system for predicting severe postpartum maternal morbidity.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Differences in Characteristics of Peripartum Patients Who Did and Did Not Require an Upgrade to the Intensive Care Unit: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- The Effectiveness of Modified Early Obstetric Warning System Training on Midwives' Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills for Early Detection of Maternal Complications in Indonesia.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal mortality is still a major challenge for health systems, while severe maternal complications are the primary causes of maternal death. Our study aimed to determine whether severe maternal morbidity is effectively predicted by a newly proposed Modified Obstetric Early Warning Score (MOEWS) in the setting of an obstetric intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA retrospective study of pregnant women admitted in the ICU from August 2019 to August 2020 was conducted. MOEWS was calculated 24 h before and 24 h after admission in the ICU, and the highest score was taken as the final value. For women directly admitted from the emergency department, the worst value before admission was collected. The aggregate performance of MOEWS in predicting critical illness in pregnant women was evaluated and finally compared with that of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score.
resultsA total of 352 pregnant women were enrolled; 290 women (82.4%) with severe maternal morbidity were identified and two of them died (0.6%). The MOEWSs of women with serious obstetric complications were significantly higher than those of women without serious obstetric complications [8(6, 10) vs. 4(2, 4.25), z = -10.347, P < 0.001]. MOEWSs of 24 h after ICU admission had higher sensitivity, specificity and AUROC than MOEWSs of 24 h before ICU admission. When combining the two MOEWSs, sensitivity of MOEWS was 99.3% (95% CI: 98-100), specificity 75.8% (95% CI: 63-86), positive predictive value (PPV) 95.1% (95% CI: 92-97) and negative predictive value (NPV) 95.9% (95% CI: 86-100). The areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of MOEWS were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.76) of the APACHE II score.
conclusionThe newly proposed MOEWS has an excellent ability to identify critically ill women early and is more effective than APACHE II. It will be a valuable tool for discriminating severe maternal morbidity and ultimately improve maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.