ReviewAcademic radiology2023
Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging Biomarker as a Multivariate Descriptor of Health: A Roadmap.
Review in Academic radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric Abdominal Ultrasound as a Source of Imaging Biomarkers in Predictive and Personalized Medicine: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bayesian Graphical Models for Multiscale Inference in Medical Image-Based Joint Degeneration Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Technical note: hydrogel-based mimics of prostate cancer with matched relaxation, diffusion and kurtosis for validating multi-parametric MRI.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Trials of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- An Online Repository for Pre-Clinical Imaging Protocols (PIPs).Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Phenotype Classification: A Framework for Development and Validation.Academic radiology · 2023Review
- Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging in Risk Prediction: Recommendations for Data Acquisition, Technical Performance Assessment, and Model Development and Validation.Academic radiology · 2023Review
- A Framework for Evaluating the Technical Performance of Multiparameter Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers (mp-QIBs).Academic radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiparametric quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) offer distinct advantages over single, univariate descriptors because they provide a more complete measure of complex, multidimensional biological systems. In disease, where structural and functional disturbances occur across a multitude of subsystems, multivariate QIBs are needed to measure the extent of system malfunction. This paper, the first Use Case in a series of articles on multiparameter imaging biomarkers, considers multiple QIBs as a multidimensional vector to represent all relevant disease constructs more completely. The approach proposed offers several advantages over QIBs as multiple endpoints and avoids combining them into a single composite that obscures the medical meaning of the individual measurements. We focus on establishing statistically rigorous methods to create a single, simultaneous measure from multiple QIBs that preserves the sensitivity of each univariate QIB while incorporating the correlation among QIBs. Details are provided for metrological methods to quantify the technical performance. Methods to reduce the set of QIBs, test the superiority of the mp-QIB model to any univariate QIB model, and design study strategies for generating precision and validity claims are also provided. QIBs of Alzheimer's Disease from the ADNI merge data set are used as a case study to illustrate the methods described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.