Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36464298›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2022

Achievements and Current Status of the Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Seiji Yasumura, Tetsuya Ohira, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Hiroki Shimura, Akira Sakai, Masaharu Maeda, Itaru Miura, Keiya Fujimori, Hitoshi Ohto, Kenji Kamiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seiji YasumuraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-2840
Tetsuya OhiraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-7165
Tetsuo IshikawaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-9608-3669
Hiroki ShimuraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-2943
Akira SakaiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0003-0128-8395
Masaharu MaedaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-0562-5160
Itaru MiuraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-2133-5809
Keiya FujimoriRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.
Hitoshi OhtoRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.
Kenji KamiyaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) was established in response to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident on March 11, 2011. The primary objectives of the study are to monitor residents' long-term health and promote their future well-being, and to determine the health effects of long-term low-dose radiation exposure. This special issue summarizes the results and current status of the FHMS and discusses the challenges and future directions of the FHMS. The FHMS, a cohort study of all people who were residents in Fukushima Prefecture at the time of the accident, consists of a Basic Survey, Thyroid Ultrasound Examination, Comprehensive Health Check, Mental Health and Lifestyle Survey, and Pregnancy and Birth Survey. The radiation exposure was estimated based on the behavioral records examined using the Basic Survey. Although the response rate was low in the Basic Survey, the representativeness of the radiation exposure data was confirmed using additional surveys. There appears to be no relationship between the radiation exposure and risk of thyroid cancer, although more thyroid cancer cases were detected than initially expected. The ongoing Comprehensive Health Check and Mental Health and Lifestyle Survey have provided evidence of worsening physical and mental health status. The Pregnancy and Birth Survey showed rates of preterm delivery, low birth weight, and congenital abnormalities similar to the national average. Considering the above evidence, the Fukushima Prefectural Government decided to end the Pregnancy and Birth Survey at the end of March 2021, as recommended by the Prefectural Oversight Committee. The framework of the FHMS has not changed, but the FHMS needs to adapt according to the survey results and the changing needs of the eligible residents and municipalities.

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentThyroid NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornMental HealthPregnancycohort studydisasterprotocolradiationthyroid gland

Identifiers

PMID36464298
PMCPMC9703928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.