ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2022
DGMP: Identifying Cancer Driver Genes by Jointing DGCN and MLP from Multi-omics Genomic Data.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplex networks-based directed graph neural network for cancer driver gene identification.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrating Multi-Source Directed Gene Networks and Multi-Omics Data to Identify Cancer Driver Genes Based on Graph Neural Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer analysis shapes the understanding of cancer biology and medicine.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- GNNMutation: a heterogeneous graph-based framework for cancer detection.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Molecular Biomarkers in Neurological Diseases: Advances in Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Enhancing Molecular Network-Based Cancer Driver Gene Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches: Current Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Computational Landscape in Drug Discovery: From AI/ML Models to Translational Application.Scientifica · 2025Review
- Sitting Interruption Modalities during Prolonged Sitting Acutely Improve Postprandial Metabolome in a Crossover Pilot Trial among Postmenopausal Women.Metabolites · 2024Article
- A feature extraction framework for discovering pan-cancer driver genes based on multi-omics data.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Biosensing: Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Novel research and future prospects of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Omics.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of cancer driver genes plays an important role in precision oncology research, which is helpful to understand cancer initiation and progression. However, most existing computational methods mainly used the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, or treated the directed gene regulatory networks (GRNs) as the undirected gene-gene association networks to identify the cancer driver genes, which will lose the unique structure regulatory information in the directed GRNs, and then affect the outcome of the cancer driver gene identification. Here, based on the multi-omics pan-cancer data (i.e., gene expression, mutation, copy number variation, and DNA methylation), we propose a novel method (called DGMP) to identify cancer driver genes by jointing directed graph convolutional network (DGCN) and multilayer perceptron (MLP). DGMP learns the multi-omics features of genes as well as the topological structure features in GRN with the DGCN model and uses MLP to weigh more on gene features for mitigating the bias toward the graph topological features in the DGCN learning process. The results on three GRNs show that DGMP outperforms other existing state-of-the-art methods. The ablation experimental results on the DawnNet network indicate that introducing MLP into DGCN can offset the performance degradation of DGCN, and jointing MLP and DGCN can effectively improve the performance of identifying cancer driver genes. DGMP can identify not only the highly mutated cancer driver genes but also the driver genes harboring other kinds of alterations (e.g., differential expression and aberrant DNA methylation) or genes involved in GRNs with other cancer genes. The source code of DGMP can be freely downloaded from https://github.com/NWPU-903PR/DGMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.