ArticleJournal of molecular biology2023
BASIN: A Semi-automatic Workflow, with Machine Learning Segmentation, for Objective Statistical Analysis of Biomedical and Biofilm Image Datasets.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Computational Prediction and Analysis of Noncoding RNAs inMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Advancing understanding of microbial biofilms through machine learning-powered studies.Food science and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micrograph comparison remains useful in bioscience. This technology provides researchers with a quick snapshot of experimental conditions. But sometimes a two- condition comparison relies on researchers' eyes to draw conclusions. Our Bioimage Analysis, Statistic, and Comparison (BASIN) software provides an objective and reproducible comparison leveraging inferential statistics to bridge image data with other modalities. Users have access to machine learning-based object segmentation. BASIN provides several data points such as images' object counts, intensities, and areas. Hypothesis testing may also be performed. To improve BASIN's accessibility, we implemented it using R Shiny and provided both an online and offline version. We used BASIN to process 498 image pairs involving five bioscience topics. Our framework supported either direct claims or extrapolations 57% of the time. Analysis results were manually curated to determine BASIN's accuracy which was shown to be 78%. Additionally, each BASIN version's initial release shows an average 82% FAIR compliance score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.