Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463886›Full record

SynthesisYearbook of medical informatics2022

A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images.

Diedre Carmo, Jean Ribeiro, Sergio Dertkigil, Simone Appenzeller, Roberto Lotufo, Leticia Rittner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unsupervised segmentation of dynamic pulmonary MRI using cross-modality adaptation with annotated CT images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Real-world federated learning in radiology: hurdles to overcome and benefits to gain.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  13. Imaging the Lung in ARDS: A Primer.Respiratory care · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inclusive Digital Health.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diedre Carmo *School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Brazil.
Jean Ribeiro *School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Brazil.
Sergio DertkigilSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Brazil.
Simone AppenzellerSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Brazil.
Roberto LotufoSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Brazil.
Leticia RittnerSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAutomated computational segmentation of the lung and its lobes and findings in X-Ray based computed tomography (CT) images is a challenging problem with important applications, including medical research, surgical planning, and diagnostic decision support. With the increase in large imaging cohorts and the need for fast and robust evaluation of normal and abnormal lungs and their lobes, several authors have proposed automated methods for lung assessment on CT images. In this paper we intend to provide a comprehensive summarization of these methods.

methodsWe used a systematic approach to perform an extensive review of automated lung segmentation methods. We chose Scopus, PubMed, and Scopus to conduct our review and included methods that perform segmentation of the lung parenchyma, lobes or internal disease related findings. The review was not limited by date, but rather by only including methods providing quantitative evaluation.

resultsWe organized and classified all 234 included articles into various categories according to methodological similarities among them. We provide summarizations of quantitative evaluations, public datasets, evaluation metrics, and overall statistics indicating recent research directions of the field.

conclusionsWe noted the rise of data-driven models in the last decade, especially due to the deep learning trend, increasing the demand for high-quality data annotation. This has instigated an increase of semi-supervised and uncertainty guided works that try to be less dependent on human annotation. In addition, the question of how to evaluate the robustness of data-driven methods remains open, given that evaluations derived from specific datasets are not general.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchTomography, X-Ray ComputedData AccuracyHumansLung

Identifiers

PMID36463886
PMCPMC9719778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.