Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463731›Full record

ArticleESMO open2022

Complete genomic characterization in patients with cancer of unknown primary origin in routine diagnostics.

L J Schipper, K G Samsom, P Snaebjornsson, T Battaglia, L J W Bosch, F Lalezari, P Priestley, C Shale, A J van den Broek, N Jacobs and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Identifying the primary tumour in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L J SchipperDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
K G SamsomDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
P SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
T BattagliaDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
L J W BoschDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
F LalezariDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P PriestleyHartwig Medical Foundation Australia, Sydney, Australia.
C ShaleHartwig Medical Foundation Australia, Sydney, Australia.
A J van den BroekHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam.
N JacobsHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam.
P RoepmanHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam.
J J M van der HoevenHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam.
N SteeghsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
M A VolleberghDepartment of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
S MarchettiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
E CuppenOncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam; Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht.
G A MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
E E VoestDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
K MonkhorstDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam. Electronic address: k.monkhorst@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLHartwig Medical Foundation · NLOncode Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn ∼3%-5% of patients with metastatic disease, tumor origin remains unknown despite modern imaging techniques and extensive pathology work-up. With long diagnostic delays and limited and ineffective therapy options, the clinical outcome of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) remains poor. Large-scale genome sequencing studies have revealed that tumor types can be predicted based on distinct patterns of somatic variants and other genomic characteristics. Moreover, actionable genomic events are present in almost half of CUP patients. This study investigated the clinical value of whole genome sequencing (WGS) in terms of primary tumor identification and detection of actionable events, in the routine diagnostic work-up of CUP patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsA WGS-based tumor type 'cancer of unknown primary prediction algorithm' (CUPPA) was developed based on previously described principles and validated on a large pan-cancer WGS database of metastatic cancer patients (>4000 samples) and 254 independent patients, respectively. We assessed the clinical value of this prediction algorithm as part of routine WGS-based diagnostic work-up for 72 CUP patients.

resultsCUPPA correctly predicted the primary tumor type in 78% of samples in the independent validation cohort (194/254 patients). High-confidence predictions (>95% precision) were obtained for 162/254 patients (64%). When integrated in the diagnostic work-up of CUP patients, CUPPA could identify a primary tumor type for 49/72 patients (68%). Most common diagnoses included non-small-cell lung (n = 7), gastroesophageal (n = 4), pancreatic (n = 4), and colorectal cancer (n = 3). Actionable events with matched therapy options in clinical trials were identified in 47% of patients.

conclusionsGenome-based tumor type prediction can predict cancer diagnoses with high accuracy when integrated in the routine diagnostic work-up of patients with metastatic cancer. With identification of the primary tumor type in the majority of patients and detection of actionable events, WGS is a valuable diagnostic tool for patients with CUP.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryGenomicsHumansWhole Genome Sequencingcancer of unknown primarydiagnostic tooltumor type predictionwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36463731
PMCPMC9808446
OpenAlexW4311072421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.