ArticleGait & posture2023
Age-related changes in gait domains: Results from the LonGenity study.
Article in Gait & posture, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Use of a Smart Band in Recording Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in the 6-Minute Walk Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's pathology and neurodegeneration with gait performance in older adults.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Gait Features in Different Environments Contributing to Participation in Outdoor Activities in Old Age (GaitAge): Protocol for an Observational Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImpairment in gait domains such as pace, rhythm, and variability are associated with falls, cognitive decline, and dementia. However, the longitudinal changes in these gait domains are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine age-related changes in gait domains overall and in those with cognitive impairment and mobility disability.
methodsParticipants were from the LonGenity study (n = 797; M Age=75.1 SD 6.5 years; 58.2% female) and were followed up to 12 years (Median=3.3; IQR: 1.1; 6.3). Gait speed and absolute values of step length, step time, cadence and, variability (standard deviation) of step length and step time during usual pace walking were assessed. Principal components analysis was used to obtain weighted combinations of three gait domains: pace (velocity, step length), variability (step length variability, step time variability) and rhythm (step time). Linear mixed effect models were used to examine age-related changes in gait domains overall, and in those with cognitive impairment and mobility disability at baseline.
resultsPace declined, and rhythm increased (worsened) in an accelerating non-linear fashion. Variability gradually increased with age. Those with cognitive impairment had faster rates of change in pace and rhythm. Those with mobility disability had faster increases in rhythm.
conclusionsAge-related changes in gait domains are not uniform. Individuals with cognitive and mobility impairments are particularly vulnerable to accelerated change in pace and or rhythm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.