Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463567›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Sulcus depth, congruence angle, Wiberg index, TT-TG distance, and CDI are strong predictors of recurrent patellar dislocation.

Jiebo Chen, Zipeng Ye, Chenliang Wu, Xueying Zhang, Jinzhong Zhao, Guoming Xie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiebo Chen *Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-4418
Zipeng Ye *Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Chenliang Wu *Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xueying ZhangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Jinzhong ZhaoDepartment of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China. jzzhao@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-1878
Guoming XieDepartment of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China. xieguoming2006@163.com.

Funding

Research Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital YNTS202001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize patellofemoral morphology, determine radiological cutoff values based on computed tomography (CT) images, and clarify predominant anatomic risk factors in young patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD).

methodsA total of 212 knees (age 23.0 ± 5.3 years, female: male = 110:102) with CT-confirmed RPD were enrolled for analysis. The control group was matched by age and sex (2:1). Patellofemoral and trochlear morphology, patellofemoral alignment, and other parameters were assessed by CT. Standardized methods were used for measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were used to assess accuracy in diagnosing RPD. The index of union (IU) was employed to identify a cutoff value for risk. A binary logistic regression model (Forward, LR) was constructed, and standardized coefficients were calculated to compare the relative strength of different predictors. Factors included in the model were employed to calculate distributions in the studied population.

resultsThe majority of measurements showed a significant difference between the RPD and control groups when comparing mean values. The AUC value was favorable for sulcus depth and significantly better than that for other trochlear morphology parameters (P < 0.0001). Cutoff values were 0.58 for the Wiberg index, 153.3° for the sulcus angle, 3.6 mm for the sulcus depth, 1.94 for the trochlear width ratio, 16.2° for the lateral trochlear inclination, 17.2° for the patellar lateral tilt, 25.5° for the congruence angle, 1.2 for the patellar height [Caton-Deschamps index (CDI)], 6.1° for the knee rotation, and 16.4 mm for the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. A binary logistic regression model (χ

conclusionsThis study provides a systematic reference of cutoff values based on CT data. The combination of five anatomic risk factors (sulcus depth, congruence angle, Wiberg index, TT-TG distance, and CDI) may be an excellent predictor of RPD as initial risk assessment. Sulcus depth, as the most frequently observed anatomic risk factor, showed the best diagnostic performance among trochlear morphological parameters and the strongest relationship with RPD, followed by the congruence angle and Wiberg index. In clinical practice, the sulcus depth, congruence angle, Wiberg index, TT-TG distance, and CDI with the proposed cutoff values can be used in combination to evaluate RPD. When assessing trochlear morphology, sulcus depth is recommended as the best radiological parameter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Joint DislocationsJoint InstabilityPatellar DislocationPatellofemoral JointAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleRetrospective StudiesTibiaYoung AdultAnatomic risk factorComputed tomography (CT)Cutoff valueMorphologyRecurrent patellar dislocation (RPD)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.