ArticleMedical physics2023
Abdomen CT multi-organ segmentation using token-based MLP-Mixer.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic Body Region Classification in CT Scans Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- OpenVocabCT: Toward Universal Text-Driven CT Image Segmentation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Federated prediction for scalable and privacy-preserved knowledge-based planning in radiotherapy.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Evaluating deep learning auto-contouring for lung radiation therapy: A review of accuracy, variability, efficiency and dose, in target volumes and organs at risk.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Special Issue: Artificial Intelligence in Advanced Medical Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Synthetic CT generation from MRI using 3D transformer-based denoising diffusion model.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Application of visual transformer in renal image analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- Robust explanation supervision for false positive reduction in pulmonary nodule detection.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Article
- An optimized framework for cone-beam computed tomography-based online evaluation for proton therapy.Medical physics · 2023Article
- 2D medical image synthesis using transformer-based denoising diffusion probabilistic model.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManual contouring is very labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to intra- and inter-observer variability. An automated deep learning approach to fast and accurate contouring and segmentation is desirable during radiotherapy treatment planning. PURPOSE: This work investigates an efficient deep-learning-based segmentation algorithm in abdomen computed tomography (CT) to facilitate radiation treatment planning.
methodsIn this work, we propose a novel deep-learning model utilizing U-shaped multi-layer perceptron mixer (MLP-Mixer) and convolutional neural network (CNN) for multi-organ segmentation in abdomen CT images. The proposed model has a similar structure to V-net, while a proposed MLP-Convolutional block replaces each convolutional block. The MLP-Convolutional block consists of three components: an early convolutional block for local features extraction and feature resampling, a token-based MLP-Mixer layer for capturing global features with high efficiency, and a token projector for pixel-level detail recovery. We evaluate our proposed network using: (1) an institutional dataset with 60 patient cases and (2) a public dataset (BCTV) with 30 patient cases. The network performance was quantitatively evaluated in three domains: (1) volume similarity between the ground truth contours and the network predictions using the Dice score coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, and precision; (2) surface similarity using Hausdorff distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD) and residual mean square distance (RMS); and (3) the computational complexity reported by the number of network parameters, training time, and inference time. The performance of the proposed network is compared with other state-of-the-art networks.
resultsIn the institutional dataset, the proposed network achieved the following volume similarity measures when averaged over all organs: DSC = 0.912, sensitivity = 0.917, precision = 0.917, average surface similarities were HD = 11.95 mm, MSD = 1.90 mm, RMS = 3.86 mm. The proposed network achieved DSC = 0.786 and HD = 9.04 mm on the public dataset. The network also shows statistically significant improvement, which is evaluated by a two-tailed Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test, on right lung (MSD where the maximum p-value is 0.001), spinal cord (sensitivity, precision, HD, RMSD where p-value ranges from 0.001 to 0.039), and stomach (DSC where the maximum p-value is 0.01) over all other competing networks. On the public dataset, the network report statistically significant improvement, which is shown by the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test, on pancreas (HD where the maximum p-value is 0.006), left (HD where the maximum p-value is 0.022) and right adrenal glands (DSC where the maximum p-value is 0.026). In both datasets, the proposed method can generate contours in less than 5 s. Overall, the proposed MLP-Vnet demonstrates comparable or better performance than competing methods with much lower memory complexity and higher speed.
conclusionsThe proposed MLP-Vnet demonstrates superior segmentation performance, in terms of accuracy and efficiency, relative to state-of-the-art methods. This reliable and efficient method demonstrates potential to streamline clinical workflows in abdominal radiotherapy, which may be especially important for online adaptive treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.