Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463404›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Learning continuous potentials from smFRET.

J Shepard Bryan, Steve Pressé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simulation-based inference captures non-Markovian effects as exemplified in protein production kinetics through cell division.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Shepard BryanCenter for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Steve PresséCenter for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Electronic address: spresse@asu.edu.

Funding

A Bayesian nonparametric approach to superresolved tracking of multiple molecules inside living cellsR01GM130745 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Theoretical Models of Single Molecule Dynamics from Minimal Photon NumbersR01GM134426 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potential energy landscapes are useful models in describing events such as protein folding and binding. While single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments encode information on continuous potentials for the system probed, including rarely visited barriers between putative potential minima, this information is rarely decoded from the data. This is because existing analysis methods often model smFRET output assuming, from the onset, that the system probed evolves in a discretized state space to be analyzed within a hidden Markov model (HMM) paradigm. By contrast, here, we infer continuous potentials from smFRET data without discretely approximating the state space. We do so by operating within a Bayesian nonparametric paradigm by placing priors on the family of all possible potential curves. As our inference accounts for a number of required experimental features raising computational cost (such as incorporating discrete photon shot noise), the framework leverages a structured-kernel-interpolation Gaussian process prior to help curtail computational cost. We show that our structured-kernel-interpolation priors for potential energy reconstruction from smFRET analysis accurately infers the potential energy landscape from a smFRET binding experiment. We then illustrate advantages of structured-kernel-interpolation priors for potential energy reconstruction from smFRET over standard HMM approaches by providing information, such as barrier heights and friction coefficients, that is otherwise inaccessible to HMMs.

Indexed as

Fluorescence Resonance Energy TransferSingle Molecule ImagingBayes TheoremPhotons

Identifiers

PMID36463404
PMCPMC9892619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.