Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463300›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2022

Implementing an outpatient clinical trial on COVID-19 treatment in an emergency epidemic context: a mixed methods study among operational and research stakeholders within the Coverage trial, Bordeaux (France).

Carine Grenier, Macha Loniewski, Mélanie Plazy, Racha Onaisi, Marie-Hélène Doucet, Jean-Philippe Joseph, Alexandre Duvignaud, Denis Malvy, Xavier Anglaret, Joanna Orne-Gliemann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carine Grenier *University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Macha Loniewski *University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Mélanie PlazyUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Racha OnaisiDepartment of General Practice, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Hélène DoucetUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Philippe JosephDepartment of General Practice, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Alexandre DuvignaudUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Denis MalvyUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Xavier AnglaretUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Joanna Orne-GliemannUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. joanna.orne-gliemann@u-bordeaux.fr.
Coverage study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergency set-up and implementation of outpatient clinical trials on epidemic emerging infectious diseases such as COVID-19 raise many issues in terms of research structuration, regulations, and health systems organization. We aimed to describe the experience and points of view of different stakeholders involved in a French home-based outpatient trial on COVID-19 and to identify the early barriers and facilitators to the trial implementation.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study in July 2020. A self-administered questionnaire was emailed to 213 clinical, operational and research stakeholders involved in the Coverage trial; individual semi-directed interviews were conducted among 14 stakeholders. Questionnaire data and written interview notes are presented together by key theme.

resultsOne hundred fifty six stakeholders responded to the questionnaire. 53.4% did not have prior experience in clinical research. The motivation of most stakeholders to participate in the Coverage trial was to feel useful during the pandemic. 87.9% agreed that the trial had an unusual set-up timeframe, and many regretted a certain lack of regulatory flexibility. Mobile medical teams and specific professional skills were perceived as instrumental for outpatient research.

conclusionsThe implementation of a home-based outpatient clinical trial on COVID-19 was perceived as relevant and innovative although requiring important adaptations of usual professional responsibilities and standard research procedures. Lessons learned from the Coverage trial underline the need for improved networks between hospital and community medicine, and call for a dedicated and reactive outpatient research platform on emerging or threatening infectious diseases.

Indexed as

AmbulatoryCovidImplementationPerceptionsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36463300
PMCPMC9719237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.