Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463273›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Study protocol for First Dental Steps Intervention: feasibility study of a health visitor led infant oral health improvement programme.

Patricia N Albers, Joanna G Williams, Sarab El-Yousfi, Zoe Marshman, Reena Patel, Rebecca Kandiyali, Katie Breheny, Frank de Vocht, Chris Metcalfe, Robert Witton and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia N Albers *Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England. patricia.albers@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-8483
Joanna G Williams *Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-1760
Sarab El-YousfiSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9295-9953
Zoe MarshmanSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0943-9637
Reena PatelHealthcare Public Health Directorate, NHS England and NHS Improvement South West, Bristol, England.
Rebecca KandiyaliCentre for Health Economics (CHEW), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Katie BrehenyBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6886-4049
Frank de VochtBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3631-627X
Chris MetcalfeBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-8907
Robert WittonFaculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-4376
Ruth KippingBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-8077
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBAt Bristol · GBNHS EnglandUniversity of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

School for Public Health Research Public Health Practice Evaluation Scheme (PHPES041)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental caries in childhood is a burden on the daily lives of children and their families, and associated with poor oral health in adulthood. In England, dental caries is the most common reason for young children to be admitted to hospital. It is believed that most tooth extractions (due to decay) for children aged 10 years and under, could be avoided with improved prevention and early management. National public health policy recommendations in England include specific oral health initiatives to tackle tooth decay. One of these initiatives is delivered as part of the Healthy Child Programme and includes providing workforce training in oral health, integrating oral health advice into home visits, and the timely provision of fluoride toothpaste. This protocol seeks to assess the delivery of the First Dental Steps intervention and uncertainties related to the acceptability, recruitment, and retention of participants.

methodsThis study seeks to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the First Dental Steps intervention and research methods. First Dental Steps intervention will be delivered in local authority areas in South West England and includes oral health training for health visitors (or community nursery nurses) working with 0-5-year-olds and their families. Further, for vulnerable families, integrating oral health advice and the provision of an oral health pack (including a free flow cup, an age appropriate toothbrush, and 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste) during a mandated check by a health visitor. In this study five local authority areas will receive the intervention. Interviews with parents receiving the intervention and health visitors delivering the intervention will be undertaken, along with a range of additional interviews with stakeholders from both intervention and comparison sites (four additional local authority areas). DISCUSSION: This protocol was written after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a result, some of the original methods were adjusted specifically to account for disruptions caused by the pandemic. Results of this study will primarily provide evidence on the acceptability and feasibility of both the First Dental Steps intervention and the research methods from the perspective of both families and stakeholders.

Indexed as

Dental cariesHealth visitingOral healthPublic health nursing

Identifiers

PMID36463273
PMCPMC9719194
OpenAlexW4311209506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.