Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463150›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Ownership and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets three months after a mass distribution campaign in Uganda, 2021.

Andrew Kwiringira, Carol Nanziri, Edirisa Juniour Nsubuga, Stella Martha Migamba, Vivian Ntono, Immaculate Atuhaire, Sherry Rita Ahirirwe, Alice Asio, Shaban Senyange, Petranilla Nakamya and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew KwiringiraUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda. akwiringira@musph.ac.ug.
Carol NanziriUganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Edirisa Juniour NsubugaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella Martha MigambaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Vivian NtonoUganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Immaculate AtuhaireUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Sherry Rita AhirirweUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Alice AsioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Shaban SenyangeUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Petranilla NakamyaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Veronicah MasanjaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah ElayeeteUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Allan KomakechUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Hildah T NansikombiUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Patience MwineUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Rose NampeeraUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex NdyabakiraUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul OkelloUganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Richard MigishaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Lilian BulageUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Benon KwesigaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel KadoberaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Damian RutazaanaUganda National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Julie R HarrisUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex R ArioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · UGMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUganda conducted its third mass long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution campaign in 2021. The target of the campaign was to ensure that 100% of households own at least one LLIN per two persons and to achieve 85% use of distributed LLINs. LLIN ownership, use and associated factors were assessed 3 months after the campaign.

methodsA cross-sectional household survey was conducted in 14 districts from 13 to 30 April, 2021. Households were selected using multistage sampling. Each was asked about LLIN ownership, use, duration since received to the time of interview, and the presence of LLINs was visually verified. Outcomes were having at least one LLIN per two household members, and individual LLIN use. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess associations between exposures and outcomes.

resultsIn total, 5529 households with 27,585 residents and 15,426 LLINs were included in the analysis. Overall, 95% of households owned ≥ 1 LLIN, 92% of the households owned ≥ 1 LLIN < 3 months old, 64% of households owned ≥ 1 LLIN per two persons in the household. Eighty-seven per cent could sleep under an LLIN if every LLIN in the household were used by two people, but only 69% slept under an LLIN the night before the survey. Factors associated with LLIN ownership included believing that LLINs are protective against malaria (aPR = 1.13; 95% CI  1.04-1.24). Reported use of mosquito repellents was negatively associated with ownership of LLINs (aPR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.95-0.98). The prevalence of LLIN use was 9% higher among persons who had LLINs 3-12 months old (aPR = 1.09; 95% CI  1.06-1.11) and 10% higher among those who had LLINs 13-24 months old (aPR = 1.10; 95% CI  1.06-1.14) than those who had LLINs < 3 months old. Of 3,859 LLINs identified in the households but not used for sleeping the previous night, 3250 (84%) were < 3 months old. Among these 3250, 41% were not used because owners were using old LLINs; 16% were not used because of lack of space for hanging them; 11% were not used because of fear of chemicals in the net; 5% were not used because of dislike of the smell of the nets; and, 27% were not used for other reasons.

conclusionThe substantial difference between the population that had access to LLINs and the population that slept under LLINs indicates that the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) may need to focus on addressing the main drivers or barriers to LLIN use. NMCP and/or other stakeholders could consider designing and conducting targeted behaviour change communication during subsequent mass distribution of LLINs after the mass distribution campaign to counter misconceptions about new LLINs.

Indexed as

InsecticidesOwnershipChild, PreschoolChlorphentermineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantUgandaChlorphentermineInsecticidesN-methylchlorphentermineLong-lasting insecticidal netsMalariaMass campaignsOwnership and useUganda

Identifiers

PMID36463150
PMCPMC9719168
OpenAlexW4311211693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.