ArticleBMC primary care2022
Clinical trial recruitment in primary care: exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure barriers and facilitators to primary care providers' involvement.
Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recruiting patients into a digital behavioural intervention in general practice: insights from the ENERGISED trial.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers Toward Clinical Trial Participation in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Implications for Oncology Research Capacity.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Tailoring an auricular point acupressure self-management program for chronic pain: lessons learned from rural partners.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring recruitment strategies for place-based research in rural areas of Australia: a comparative case study analysis.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed-methods study.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Insights from recruiting individuals with mild dementia and care partners for a multi-site oral hygiene intervention.Aging and health research · 2025Article
- Provider experiences with and attitudes about an embedded pragmatic clinical trial.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- "Developing a manual clinical trials screening process in a diverse southern gynecologic oncology practice".Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Clinical course of spinal pain in adolescents: a feasibility study in a chiropractic setting.BMJ open · 2025Article
- General Practitioners (GP) experiences in managing patients in clinical trials conducted by non-GP specialists: An exploratory qualitative study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Clinical Trials for Special Populations: Children, Older Adults, and Rare Diseases.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2024Review
- Involving patients and clinicians in the development of a randomised clinical trial protocol to assess spinal manual therapy versus nerve root injection for patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a patient and public involvement project to inform the SALuBRITY trial design.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- "Do they REALLY trust us"?: Lessons from a volunteer research registry.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Enhance Recruitment of Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Trials.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Primary care provider perspectives on a planned multi-cancer early detection test clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Patients With Diabetes in Primary Care: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Perinatal Care Provider Perspectives on Integrating Clinical Research Into the Clinical Infrastructure.Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecruitment of sufficient participants for clinical trials remains challenging. Primary care is an important avenue for patient recruitment but is underutilized. We developed and pilot tested a questionnaire to measure relevant barriers and facilitators to primary care providers' involvement in recruiting patients for clinical trials.
methodsPrior research informed the development of the questionnaire. The initial instrument was revised using feedback obtained from cognitive interviews. We invited all primary care providers practicing within the University of Utah Health system to complete the revised questionnaire. We used a mixed-mode design to collect paper responses via in-person recruitment and email contacts to collect responses online. Descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, and multivariable regression analyses were conducted.
resultsSixty-seven primary care providers participated in the survey. Exploratory factor analysis suggested retaining five factors, representing the importance of clinical trial recruitment in providers' professional identity, clinic-level interventions to facilitate referral, patient-related barriers, concerns about patient health management, and knowledge gaps. The five factors exhibited good or high internal consistency reliability. Professional identity and clinic-level intervention factors were significant predictors of providers' intention to participate in clinical trial recruitment activities.
conclusionsResults of this exploratory analysis provide preliminary evidence of the internal structure, internal consistency reliability, and predictive validity of the questionnaire to measure factors relevant to primary care providers' involvement in clinical trial recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.