Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463119›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity and sedentary behavior during pregnancy: a prospective study.

Susan Park, Robert T Marcotte, John W Staudenmayer, Scott J Strath, Patty S Freedson, Lisa Chasan-Taber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan ParkDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003-9304, USA.
Robert T MarcotteDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
John W StaudenmayerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Scott J StrathDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Patty S FreedsonDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Lisa Chasan-TaberDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003-9304, USA. LCT@umass.edu.

Funding

Update and Novel Validation of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ)R21HD094565 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI CHASAN-TABER, LISA, STAUDENMAYER, JOHN W · 2018 to 2019
$431k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD094565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnancy physical activity (PA) have largely been limited to internet-based surveys not validated for use in pregnancy.

methodsThis study used data from the Pregnancy PA Questionnaire Validation study conducted from 2019-2021. A prospective cohort of 50 pregnant women completed the Pregnancy PA Questionnaire (PPAQ), validated for use in pregnancy, in early, mid, and late pregnancy and wore an ActiGraph GT3X-BT for seven days. COVID-19 impact was defined using a fixed date of onset (March 13, 2020) and a self-reported date. Multivariable linear mixed effects regression models adjusted for age, early pregnancy BMI, gestational age, and parity.

resultsHigher sedentary behavior (14.2 MET-hrs/wk, 95% CI: 2.3, 26.0) and household/caregiving PA (34.4 MET-hrs/wk, 95% CI: 8.5, 60.3 and 25.9 MET-hrs/wk, 95% CI: 0.9, 50.9) and lower locomotion (-8.0 h/wk, 95% CI: -15.7, -0.3) and occupational PA (-34.5 MET-hrs/wk, 95% CI: -61.9, -7.0 and -30.6 MET-hrs/wk, 95% CI: -51.4, -9.8) was observed in middle and late pregnancy, respectively, after COVID-19 vs. before. There was no impact on steps/day or meeting American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines.

conclusionsProactive approaches for the promotion of pregnancy PA during pandemic-related restrictions are critically needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sedentary BehaviorExerciseFemaleHumansPandemicsParityPregnancyProspective StudiesCOVID-19EpidemiologyExercisePhysical activity assessmentPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36463119
PMCPMC9719639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.