Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463103›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Primary healthcare providers challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Lusine Aslanyan, Zaruhi Arakelyan, Astghik Atanyan, Arpine Abrahamyan, Manya Karapetyan, Serine Sahakyan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lusine AslanyanTurpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019, Yerevan, Armenia. laslanyan@aua.am.
Zaruhi ArakelyanTurpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019, Yerevan, Armenia.
Astghik AtanyanTurpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019, Yerevan, Armenia.
Arpine AbrahamyanTurpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019, Yerevan, Armenia.
Manya KarapetyanTurpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019, Yerevan, Armenia.
Serine SahakyanTurpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019, Yerevan, Armenia.
American University of Armenia · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary healthcare (PHC) providers are widely acknowledged for putting the most efficient and long-lasting efforts for addressing community health issues and promoting health equity. This study aimed to explore PHC providers' experiences with coronavirus pandemic preparedness and response in Armenia.

methodsWe applied a qualitative study design using semi-structured in-depth interviews and structured observation checklists. Study participants were recruited using theoretical and convenience sampling techniques throughout Armenia. Inductive conventional content analysis was utilized to analyze the in-depth interviews. Nineteen in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 participants. Observations took place in 35 PHC facilities. The data collected during the observations was analyzed using the "SPSS22.0.0.0" software.

resultsFive main themes of primary healthcare providers' experiences were drawn out based on the study findings: 1) the gap in providers' risk communication skills; 2) uneven supply distributions; 3) difficulties in specimen collection and testing processes; 4) providers challenged by home visits; 5) poor patient-provider relationships. The results revealed that primary care providers were affected by uneven supply distribution throughout the country. The lack of proper laboratory settings and issues with specimen collection were challenges shaping the providers' experiences during the pandemic. The study highlighted the health systems' unpreparedness to engage providers in home visits for COVID-19 patients. The findings suggested that it was more challenging for healthcare providers to gain the trust of their patients during the pandemic. The study results also underlined the need for trainings to help primary care providers enhance their risk communication expertise or assign other responsible bodies to carry out risk communication on PHC providers' behalf.

conclusionThe study discovered that PHC providers have a very important role in healthcare system's preparedness and response to handle public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the findings the study team recommends prioritizing rural PHC development, ensuring appropriate supply distributions, developing comprehensive protocols on safe home visits and specimen collection and testing processes, and trainings PHC providers on risk communication, patient-centeredness, as well as proper use of personal protective equipment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchRisk ManagementCOVID-19Home visitsPatientsPPEPrimary healthcareProvidersQualitative researchRisk communicationSpecimen collectionSupply distribution

Identifiers

PMID36463103
PMCPMC9719166
OpenAlexW4311212914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.