Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463027›Full record

Trial reportNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2024

Efficacy of High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion for Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Burak Erken, Ipek S Edipoglu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07303309 (Effectiveness of High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07303309 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHasanuddin UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled22ConditionsLumbosacral Radicular Pain, Chronic Radicular Back PainArmsPulsed Radiofrequency, Post-operative Analgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Burak ErkenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Çam ve Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ipek S EdipogluDepartment of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Lewisham, London, UK. Electronic address: dripeks@yahoo.com.
Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality · TRUniversity Hospital Lewisham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is an efficacious treatment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain, but the optimal radiofrequency parameters are inadequately described. We hypothesized that high-voltage radiofrequency therapy around the dorsal root ganglion can be more effective and enduring than the standard voltage PRF therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a prospective and randomized study. Patients were divided into two groups. In group 1 (high-voltage group), PRF was applied at 60 V to the patients. Patients in group 2 (low-voltage group) received PRF treatment at 45 V. The patients were evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Evaluation scales were repeated before the intervention and at the first and sixth months after the treatment.

resultsThe study included 41 analyzed patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups at the first-month NRS (p > 0.05). Sixth-month NRS scores were lower in the high-voltage group (p = 0.016). The groups showed no statistically significant differences in the one-month ODI scores (p > 0.05). When the NRS values were analyzed with linear regression, a positive correlation was found between the sixth-month NRS values and high-voltage PRF (odds ratio: 0.385; p = 0.013). Comparison of the treatment success in terms of time showed statistically significant results in both groups in the first and sixth months (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe results of our study revealed that both low- and high-voltage PRF are effective. Because of the lower sixth-month NRS values in the high-voltage group and the similar complication rate, it was considered that high-voltage PRF can be a promising application.

Indexed as

Pulsed Radiofrequency TreatmentRadiofrequency TherapyBack PainGanglia, SpinalHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChronic paindorsal root ganglionhigh-voltagelumbosacralpulsed radiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID36463027
OpenAlexW4310668228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.