Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36462230›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence2023

Telemedicine along the cascade of care for substance use disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Chunqing Lin, Huyen Pham, Yuhui Zhu, Sarah E Clingan, Lewei Allison Lin, Sean M Murphy, Cynthia I Campbell, Tanya R Sorrell, Yanping Liu, Larissa J Mooney and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chunqing LinDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Huyen PhamDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Yuhui ZhuDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Sarah E ClinganDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Lewei Allison LinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Sean M MurphyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Cynthia I CampbellCenter for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, 401 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Tanya R SorrellUniversity of Colorado College of Nursing, 13120 E. 19th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Yanping LiuCenter for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Larissa J MooneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.
Yih-Ing HserDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA. Electronic address: yhser@ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USColorado College · USCornell University · USKaiser Permanente · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Project-002UG1DA040314 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Ingrid A Binswanger, CYNTHIA I CAMPBELL · 2015 to 2026
$34.9M
Greater Southern California Node of the Clinical Trials NetworkUG1DA049435 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YIH-ING HSER · 2019 to 2026
$16.7M
Using telehealth to expand treatment access for Veterans with opioid use disorderIK2HX002612 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI LIN, LEWEI ALLISON · 2019 to 2024
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002612NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA040314NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA049435NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has changed the landscape of healthcare service delivery. This review aims to describe telemedicine-delivered substance use disorder (SUD) treatments and services along the cascade of care in the U.S. after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA literature review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (Wiley). English-language articles that describe any healthcare services for patients with SUDs using telemedicine in the U.S. since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were identified (N = 33). We narratively summarized telemedicine-based service provision along the cascade of SUD care, such as screening/assessment, prescription, monitoring, recovery support, and other services.

resultsSoon after the onset of COVID-19 and mandated restrictions, cadres of healthcare providers from different specialties mobilized to ramp up video- and audio-based services to remotely treat patients with SUDs. Medication prescription (48.5%) and individual counseling (39.4%) were the most frequently reported services delivered via telemedicine. Other steps of SUD care delivered by telemedicine characterized in our review included SUD screening and assessment (30.3%), induction (21.2%), medication management (27.3%), monitoring (27.3%), recovery support (15.2%), and referral (24.2%). Feasibility issues and challenges to implementing telemedicine included patients' lack of access to technology and health insurance coverage, providers' capacity limits and concerns, and clinics' financial and office-space constraints.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has offered a window of opportunity to advance telemedicine expertise by formalizing clinical guidance and routinizing provider in-service training in virtual SUD treatment. Findings suggest enhanced efforts to reduce disparities in telemedicine-based services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Substance-Related DisordersTelemedicineDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsUnited StatesCOVID-19, Healthcare servicesSubstance use disorderTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36462230
PMCPMC9683518
OpenAlexW4309928821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.