Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36462185›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2023

Reviving the anatomic past: Breathing new life into historic anatomical teaching tools.

Dearbhla P Cullinane, Callum Franklin, Denis S Barry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dearbhla P CullinaneDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9901-096X
Callum FranklinDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Denis S BarryDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-4275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a shift in the way anatomy education is delivered. With the introduction of blended learning, cadaveric dissection is no longer the be all and end all and, in many cases, the continuing role of anatomical teaching artefacts has declined after decades of prominence. While some institutions have abandoned their archaic anatomical collections and medical museums completely, others have invested in their technological enhancement. We describe the integration of historical teaching artefacts into contemporary anatomy education through the development of an interactive online e-platform and shed light on the enduring pedagogic value of past anatomical teaching specimen.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateDissectionHumansLearninganatomy educationblended learninggross anatomymedical museumspedagogy

Identifiers

PMID36462185
PMCPMC10008267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.