Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36462177›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2023

Impacts of the 2019/20 bushfires and COVID-19 pandemic on the physical and mental health of older Australians: a cross-sectional survey.

Elizabeth Halcomb, Cristina Thompson, Darcy Morris, Sharon James, Tasmin Dilworth, Katharine Haynes, Marijka Batterham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth HalcombSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-986X
Cristina ThompsonAustralian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4369-0940
Darcy MorrisAustralian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-7453
Sharon JamesSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-3447
Tasmin DilworthCentre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3083-1879
Katharine HaynesCentre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1024-6878
Marijka BatterhamNational Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9520-6508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019/20 major bushfires devastated Australia's East Coast. Shortly afterward the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. Older people are disproportionately affected by disasters and are at high risk from respiratory pandemics. However, little is known about how these events impact on older peoples' health and well-being and engagement with services such as primary care.

objectiveTo explore the health impacts of the 2019/20 bushfires and the COVID-19 pandemic on older Australians' health and well-being.

methodsOne hundred and fifty-five people aged over 65 years living in South-eastern New South Wales, Australia participated in an online survey. The survey measured the impacts of the bushfires and COVID-19 on physical and mental health and the capacity of older people to manage these impacts.

resultsMost respondents felt that the bushfires caused them to feel anxious/worried (86.2%) and negatively affected their physical (59.9%) and mental (57.2%) health. While many participants had similar feelings about COVID-19, significantly fewer felt these physical and mental health impacts than from the bushfires. A significantly greater perceived level of impact was observed for females and those with health problems. More respondents described negative mental health than physical health effects. Those who felt more impacted by the events had lower levels of resilience, social connection and support, and self-rated health.

conclusionThe health impacts identified in this study represent an opportunity for primary care to intervene to both ensure that people with support needs are identified and provided timely support and that older people are prepared for future disasters.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthWildfiresAgedAustralasian PeopleAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNatural DisastersPandemicsagedAustraliaCOVID-19primary caresurveys and questionnaireswildfires

Identifiers

PMID36462177
PMCPMC10231380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.