Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36462150›Full record

SynthesisEpilepsia2023

Transforming epilepsy research: A systematic review on natural language processing applications.

Arister N J Yew, Marijn Schraagen, Willem M Otte, Eric van Diessen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. [Structured Annotation and Information Extraction of Epilepsy Clinical Texts].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical signatures of genetic epilepsies precede diagnosis in electronic medical records of 32,000 individuals.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arister N J YewUniversity College Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marijn SchraagenDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem M OtteDepartment of Child Neurology, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1511-6834
Eric van DiessenDepartment of Child Neurology, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-1990

Funding

EWUU grant 'AI for Health' (2021)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improved ancillary investigations in epilepsy care, patients' narratives remain indispensable for diagnosing and treatment monitoring. This wealth of information is typically stored in electronic health records and accumulated in medical journals in an unstructured manner, thereby restricting complete utilization in clinical decision-making. To this end, clinical researchers increasing apply natural language processing (NLP)-a branch of artificial intelligence-as it removes ambiguity, derives context, and imbues standardized meaning from free-narrative clinical texts. This systematic review presents an overview of the current NLP applications in epilepsy and discusses the opportunities and drawbacks of NLP alongside its future implications. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases with a "natural language processing" and "epilepsy" query (March 4, 2022) and included original research articles describing the application of NLP techniques for textual analysis in epilepsy. Twenty-six studies were included. Fifty-eight percent of these studies used NLP to classify clinical records into predefined categories, improving patient identification and treatment decisions. Other applications of NLP had structured clinical information retrieval from electronic health records, scientific papers, and online posts of patients. Challenges and opportunities of NLP applications for enhancing epilepsy care and research are discussed. The field could further benefit from NLP by replicating successes in other health care domains, such as NLP-aided quality evaluation for clinical decision-making, outcome prediction, and clinical record summarization.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNatural Language ProcessingDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsHumansPubMedclinical epilepsymachine learningnatural language processingtextual analysis

Identifiers

PMID36462150
PMCPMC10108221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.