Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461918›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular research2023

Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic.

Bruno Reichart, David K C Cooper, Matthias Längin, Ralf R Tönjes, Richard N Pierson, Eckhard Wolf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gene-edited pig cardiac xenotransplantation as a bridge to allotransplantation in infants: Progress in a pig-to-baboon model.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Allogeneic, Xenogeneic, and Exogenic Hearts for Transplantation.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pig Lung Xenotransplantation: Barriers on the Road to Clinical Translation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Extended survival of 9- and 10-gene-edited pig heart xenografts with ischemia minimization and CD154 costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno ReichartWalter Brendel Centre for Experimental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 81377, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-3664
David K C CooperCenter for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8899-9431
Matthias LänginDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 81377, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-4941
Ralf R TönjesDivision of Medical Biotechnology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen 63225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-1935
Richard N PiersonCenter for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-4590
Eckhard WolfGene Centre and Centre for Innovative Medical Models (CiMM), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich 81377, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0430-9510
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHarvard University · USPaul Ehrlich Institut · DE

Funding

Prolonging life-supported pig kidney and heart graft survival in baboons by suppressing inflammationU19AI090959 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COOPER, DAVID KC · 2010 to 2024
$26.3M
CRISPR-Modified Cardiac Xenograft TransplantationU01AI153612 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PIERSON, RICHARD N · 2021 to 2024
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI153612NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090959NIH HHS U19 AI090959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many patients with terminal/advanced cardiac failure, heart transplantation is the most effective, durable treatment option, and offers the best prospects for a high quality of life. The number of potentially life-saving donated human organs is far fewer than the population who could benefit from a new heart, resulting in increasing numbers of patients awaiting replacement of their failing heart, high waitlist mortality, and frequent reliance on interim mechanical support for many of those deemed among the best candidates but who are deteriorating as they wait. Currently, mechanical assist devices supporting left ventricular or biventricular heart function are the only alternative to heart transplant that is in clinical use. Unfortunately, the complication rate with mechanical assistance remains high despite advances in device design and patient selection and management, and the quality of life of the patients even with good outcomes is only moderately improved. Cardiac xenotransplantation from genetically multi-modified (GM) organ-source pigs is an emerging new option as demonstrated by the consistent long-term success of heterotopic (non-life-supporting) abdominal and life-supporting orthotopic porcine heart transplantation in baboons, and by a recent 'compassionate use' transplant of the heart from a GM pig with 10 modifications into a terminally ill patient who survived for 2 months. In this review, we discuss pig heart xenotransplantation as a concept, including pathobiological aspects related to immune rejection, coagulation dysregulation, and detrimental overgrowth of the heart, as well as GM strategies in pigs to prevent or minimize these problems. Additional topics discussed include relevant results of heterotopic and orthotopic heart transplantation experiments in the pig-to-baboon model, microbiological and virologic safety concepts, and efficacy requirements for initiating formal clinical trials. An adequate regulatory and ethical framework as well as stringent criteria for the selection of patients will be critical for the safe clinical development of cardiac xenotransplantation, which we expect will be clinically tested during the next few years.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationQuality of LifeAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGraft RejectionHumansSwineTransplantation, HeterologousTreatment OutcomeHeartNon-human primatePigXenotransplantation clinicalXenotransplantation experimental

Identifiers

PMID36461918
PMCPMC9897693
OpenAlexW4310643632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.