Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461788›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2023

Predicting mortality in patients with anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: development of a prediction model using data from the TENTACLE-Esophagus study.

Sander Ubels, Bastiaan Klarenbeek, Moniek Verstegen, Stefan Bouwense, Ewen A Griffiths, Frans van Workum, Camiel Rosman, Gerjon Hannink, TENTACLE—Esophagus Collaborative Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sander UbelsDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-5436
Bastiaan KlarenbeekDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Moniek VerstegenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8371-509X
Stefan BouwenseDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ewen A GriffithsDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6630-3547
Frans van WorkumDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Camiel RosmanDepartment of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
TENTACLE—Esophagus Collaborative Group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after esophagectomy, and over 10% of patients with AL suffer mortality. Different prognostic factors in patients with AL are known, but a tool to predict mortality after AL is lacking. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for postoperative mortality in patients with AL after esophagectomy. TENTACLE-Esophagus is an international retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality. Previously identified prognostic factors for mortality were selected as predictors: patient-related (e.g. comorbidity, performance status) and leak-related predictors (e.g. leucocyte count, overall gastric conduit condition). The prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression and validated internally using bootstrapping. Among the 1509 patients with AL, 90-day mortality was 11.7%. Sixteen predictors were included in the prediction model. The model showed good performance after internal validation: the c-index was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.83). Predictions for mortality by the internally validated model aligned well with observed 90-day mortality rates. The prediction model was incorporated in an online tool for individual use and can be found at: https://www.tentaclestudy.com/prediction-model. The developed prediction model combines patient-related and leak-related factors to accurately predict postoperative mortality in patients with AL after esophagectomy. The model is useful for clinicians during counselling of patients and their families and may aid identification of high-risk patients at diagnosis of AL. In the future, the tool may guide clinical decision-making; however, external validation of the tool is warranted.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakEsophageal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalEsophagectomyEsophagusHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsanastomotic leakcomplicationsesophagectomypostoperative mortalityprediction model

Identifiers

PMID36461788
PMCPMC10150169
OpenAlexW4310643319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.