SynthesisUnited European gastroenterology journal2023
Gastric cancer detection by non-blood-based liquid biopsies: A systematic review looking into the last decade of research.
Synthesis in United European gastroenterology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric cancer detection by non-blood-based liquid biopsies: A systematic review looking into the last decade of research.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Pooled it
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Review
- Use of free blood in the stomach to diagnose gastric mucosal lesions prior to endoscopy: the Sanguis-filum.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Urinary metabolomics-based machine learning for diagnosis of early gastric neoplasia: a retrospective diagnostic case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicle-derived lncRNA-GC1 serves as a novel biomarker for predicting and monitoring the immunotherapeutic outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Gastric Juice Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer: New Trends?Maedica · 2024Article
- Exploring the Link betweenAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Liquid biopsy for gastric cancer: Techniques, applications, and future directions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Long Noncoding RNA VLDLR-AS1 Levels in Serum Correlate with Combat-Related Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Depression Symptoms in US Veterans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Device-Based Virus Detection and Quantification in Future Diagnostic Research: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.Biosensors · 2023Review
- The Human Gastric Juice: A Promising Source for Gastric Cancer Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Circulating Biomarkers for Cancer Detection: Could Salivary microRNAs Be an Opportunity for Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics?Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Linking dysbiosis to precancerous stomach through inflammation: Deeper than and beyond imaging.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Role of salivary miRNAs in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders: a mini-review of available evidence.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) screening is arguable in most Western countries. Liquid biopsies are a great promise to answer the unmet need for less invasive diagnostic biomarkers in GC. Thus, we aimed at systematically reviewing the current knowledge on liquid biopsy-based biomarkers in GC screening. A systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was performed on published articles reporting the use of non-blood specimen (saliva, gastric juice [GJ], urine and stool) on GC diagnosis. 3208 records were retrieved by June 2022. After removal of duplicate records, 2379 abstracts were screened, and 84 full texts included in this systematic review. More than 90% of studies were reported on Asian populations. Overall, 9 studies explored stool-, 12 saliva-, and 29 urine-derived biomarkers for GC detection. Additionally, 37 studies, representing the majority, analyzed GJ, focusing on nucleic acid molecules. Several miRNAs and lncRNA molecules have been associated with GC risk, particularly miR-21 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00). Considering salivary biomarkers, the best described model in validation sets included the soybean agglutinin and Vicia villosa agglutinin lectins (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99). Most studies in urine carried out metabolomic approaches, with two discriminatory models presenting AUC values superior to 0.97. This systematic review emphasizes the potential role of non-blood-based biomarkers, although further validation, particularly in Western countries, is mandatory, namely for non-invasive screening and/or monitoring, as well as the use of GJ as a tool to enhance upper gastrointestinal endoscopy accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.