Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461629›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of mental health nursing2023

The impact of COVID-19 on the mental health workforce: A rapid review.

Kaitlyn M Crocker, Inge Gnatt, Darren Haywood, Ingrid Butterfield, Ravi Bhat, Anoop Raveendran Nair Lalitha, Zoe M Jenkins, David J Castle

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of mental health nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaitlyn M CrockerDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6352-0407
Inge GnattDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-8448
Darren HaywoodDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9317-4135
Ingrid ButterfieldSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-8919
Ravi BhatDepartment of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia.
Anoop Raveendran Nair LalithaDepartment of Mental health, Grampians Area Mental Health & well-being Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Zoe M JenkinsDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8551-0792
David J CastleDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-1580
Curtin University · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAGoulburn Valley Health · AUMental Health Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Department of Health, State Government of Victoria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant adaptations to healthcare. Provision of mental healthcare in a changing environment presented healthcare workers with unique challenges and demands, including changes in workload and expectations. To inform current and future healthcare service responses, and adaptations, the current review aimed to collate and examine the impact of the pandemic on mental healthcare workers (MHWs). We conducted a rapid systematic review to examine the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on MHWs. Searches were conducted in Ovid Medline and PsycInfo and restricted to articles published from 2020. Inclusion criteria specified articles written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals, and that examined any outcome of the impact of COVID-19 on MHWs; 55 articles fulfilled these criteria. Outcomes were categorized into 'work-related outcomes' and 'personal outcomes'. Mental healthcare workers worldwide experienced a range of work-related and personal adversities during the pandemic. Key work-related outcomes included increased workload, changed roles, burnout, decreased job satisfaction, telehealth challenges, difficulties with work-life balance, altered job performance, vicarious trauma and increased workplace violence. Personal outcomes included decreased well-being, increased psychological distress and psychosocial difficulties. These outcomes differed between inpatient, outpatient and remote settings. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered the delivery of mental healthcare and MHWs experienced both work-related and personal adversities during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the continuation of changes introduced to healthcare in the initial stages of the pandemic, it will be important to maintain efforts to monitor negative outcomes and ensure supports for MHWs, going forward.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Health PersonnelHealth WorkforceHumansPandemicsCOVID-19mental healthmental health personnelmental health services

Identifiers

PMID36461629
PMCPMC9878253
OpenAlexW4310644578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.