Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461122›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2022

Is plasma amyloid-β 1-42/1-40 a better biomarker for Alzheimer's disease than AβX-42/X-40?

Hans-Wolfgang Klafki, Barbara Morgado, Oliver Wirths, Olaf Jahn, Chris Bauer, Hermann Esselmann, Johannes Schuchhardt, Jens Wiltfang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biomarkers Unveiling the Interplay of Mind, Nervous System, and Immunity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hans-Wolfgang KlafkiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. hans.klafki@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Barbara MorgadoDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Oliver WirthsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Olaf JahnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Chris BauerMicroDiscovery GmbH, Marienburger Strasse 1, 10405, Berlin, Germany.
Hermann EsselmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Johannes SchuchhardtMicroDiscovery GmbH, Marienburger Strasse 1, 10405, Berlin, Germany.
Jens WiltfangDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEMicroDiscovery (Germany) · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0479B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA reduced amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40 peptide ratio in blood plasma represents a peripheral biomarker of the cerebral amyloid pathology observed in Alzheimer's disease brains. The magnitude of the measurable effect in plasma is smaller than in cerebrospinal fluid, presumably due to dilution by Aβ peptides originating from peripheral sources. We hypothesized that the observable effect in plasma can be accentuated to some extent by specifically measuring Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 instead of AβX-42 and AβX-40.

methodsWe assessed the plasma AβX-42/X-40 and Aβ1-42/1-40 ratios in an idealized clinical sample by semi-automated Aβ immunoprecipitation followed by closely related sandwich immunoassays. The amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups (dichotomized according to Aβ42/40 in cerebrospinal fluid) were compared regarding the median difference, mean difference, standardized effect size (Cohen's d) and receiver operating characteristic curves. For statistical evaluation, we applied bootstrapping.

resultsThe median Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio was 20.86% lower in amyloid-positive subjects than in the amyloid-negative group, while the median AβX-42/X-40 ratio was only 15.56% lower. The relative mean difference between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative subjects was -18.34% for plasma Aβ1-42/1-40 compared to -15.50% for AβX-42/X-40. Cohen's d was 1.73 for Aβ1-42/1-40 and 1.48 for plasma AβX-42/X-40. Unadjusted p-values < 0.05 were obtained after .632 bootstrapping for all three parameters. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated very similar areas under the curves for plasma Aβ1-42/1-40 and AβX-42/X-40.

conclusionsOur findings support the hypothesis that the relatively small difference in the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio between subjects with and without evidence of brain amyloidosis can be accentuated by specifically measuring Aβ1-42/1-40 instead of AβX-42/X-40. A simplified theoretical model explaining this observation is presented.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersBrainHumansPlasmaROC CurveBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid-β peptidesAβ42/40 ratioBiomarkerBlood plasmaImmunoassay

Identifiers

PMID36461122
PMCPMC9719149
OpenAlexW4310774638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.