ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2022
Is plasma amyloid-β 1-42/1-40 a better biomarker for Alzheimer's disease than AβX-42/X-40?
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of immunoprecipitation with subsequent immunoassays for the blood-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Aggregation-Dependent Epitope Sequence and Modification Fingerprints of Anti-Aβ Antibodies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Binding of Pro-Inflammatory Proteins S100A8 or S100A9 to Amyloid-β Peptide Suppresses Its Fibrillation.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Biomarkers Unveiling the Interplay of Mind, Nervous System, and Immunity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Plasma amyloid beta X-42/X-40 ratio and cognitive decline in suspected early and preclinical Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Amyloid-β peptide signature associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy in familial Alzheimer's disease with APPdup and Down syndrome.Acta neuropathologica · 2024Article
- Precise prediction of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta protein for early Alzheimer's disease detection using multimodal data.MedComm · 2024Article
- Simian varicella virus infection and reactivation in rhesus macaques trigger cytokine and Aβ40/42 alterations in serum and cerebrospinal fluid.Journal of neurovirology · 2024Article
- Blood plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Aβ1-42/1-40 vs. AβX-42/X-40.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- The association of body mass index and body composition with plasma amyloid beta levels.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Perioperative care and recovery outcome of deep jugular venous lymphatic anastomosis in Alzheimer's disease: A case report.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA reduced amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40 peptide ratio in blood plasma represents a peripheral biomarker of the cerebral amyloid pathology observed in Alzheimer's disease brains. The magnitude of the measurable effect in plasma is smaller than in cerebrospinal fluid, presumably due to dilution by Aβ peptides originating from peripheral sources. We hypothesized that the observable effect in plasma can be accentuated to some extent by specifically measuring Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 instead of AβX-42 and AβX-40.
methodsWe assessed the plasma AβX-42/X-40 and Aβ1-42/1-40 ratios in an idealized clinical sample by semi-automated Aβ immunoprecipitation followed by closely related sandwich immunoassays. The amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups (dichotomized according to Aβ42/40 in cerebrospinal fluid) were compared regarding the median difference, mean difference, standardized effect size (Cohen's d) and receiver operating characteristic curves. For statistical evaluation, we applied bootstrapping.
resultsThe median Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio was 20.86% lower in amyloid-positive subjects than in the amyloid-negative group, while the median AβX-42/X-40 ratio was only 15.56% lower. The relative mean difference between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative subjects was -18.34% for plasma Aβ1-42/1-40 compared to -15.50% for AβX-42/X-40. Cohen's d was 1.73 for Aβ1-42/1-40 and 1.48 for plasma AβX-42/X-40. Unadjusted p-values < 0.05 were obtained after .632 bootstrapping for all three parameters. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated very similar areas under the curves for plasma Aβ1-42/1-40 and AβX-42/X-40.
conclusionsOur findings support the hypothesis that the relatively small difference in the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio between subjects with and without evidence of brain amyloidosis can be accentuated by specifically measuring Aβ1-42/1-40 instead of AβX-42/X-40. A simplified theoretical model explaining this observation is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.