Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461087›Full record

Trial reportGlobal health research and policy2022

Policy stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators to launching a community-wide mass drug administration program for soil-transmitted helminths.

Amy Roll, Malvika Saxena, Elizabeth Orlan, Angelin Titus, Sanjay Kamlakar Juvekar, Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore, Euripide Avokpaho, Félicien Chabi, Comlanvi Innocent Togbevi, Abiguel Belou Elijan and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Global health research and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03014167 (Field Studies on the Feasibility of Interrupting the Transmission of Soil-transmitted Helminths), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03014167 phase3completednot on this map

Field Studies on the Feasibility of Interrupting the Transmission of Soil-transmitted Helminths (STH) DeWorm3 Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2017 to 2024Enrolled357,716ConditionsHelminthiasis, FilariasisArmsAlbendazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Amy RollDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. amyroll7@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5815-3988
Malvika SaxenaThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Elizabeth OrlanDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Angelin TitusThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Sanjay Kamlakar JuvekarVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Marie-Claire Gwayi-ChoreDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Euripide AvokpahoInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Félicien ChabiInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Comlanvi Innocent TogbeviInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Abiguel Belou ElijanInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Providence NindiBlantyre Institute for Community Outreach, Blantyre, Malawi.
Judd L WalsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sitara S R AjjampurThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Moudachirou IbikounléInstitut de Recherche Clinique du Bénin, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.
Khumbo KaluaBlantyre Institute for Community Outreach, Blantyre, Malawi.
Kumudha AruldasThe Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Arianna Rubin MeansDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. aerubin@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence suggests that soil-transmitted helminth (STH) transmission interruption may be feasible through community-wide mass drug administration (cMDA) that deworms community members of all ages. A change from school-based deworming to cMDA will require reconfiguring of STH programs in endemic countries. We conducted formative qualitative research in Benin, India, and Malawi to identify barriers and facilitators to successfully launching a cMDA program from the policy-stakeholder perspective.

methodsWe conducted 40 key informant interviews with policy stakeholders identified as critical change agents at national, state/district, and sub-district levels. Participants included World Health Organization country office staff, implementing partners, and national and sub-national government officials. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to guide data collection, coding, and analysis. Heat maps were used to organize coded data and differentiate perceived facilitators and barriers to launching cMDA by stakeholder.

resultsKey facilitators to launching a cMDA program included availability of high-quality, tailored sensitization materials, and human and material resources that could be leveraged from previous MDA campaigns. Key barriers included the potential to overburden existing health workers, uncertainty of external funding to sustain a cMDA program, and concerns about weak intragovernmental coordination to implement cMDA. Cross-cutting themes included the need for rigorous trial evidence on STH transmission interruption to gain confidence in cMDA, and implementation evidence to effectively operationalize cMDA. Importantly, if policy stakeholders anticipate a cMDA program cannot be sustained due to cost and human resource barriers in the long term they may be less likely to support the launch of a program in the short term.

conclusionsOverall, policy stakeholders were optimistic about implementing cMDA primarily because they believe that the tools necessary to successfully implement cMDA are already available. Policy stakeholders in this study were cautiously optimistic about launching cMDA to achieve STH transmission interruption and believe that it is feasible to implement. However, launching cMDA as an alternative policy to school-based deworming will require addressing key resource and evidence barriers. Trial registration This study was registered in the U.S. National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials registry (NCT03014167).

Indexed as

HelminthsMass Drug AdministrationAnimalsGlutamatesHumansNitrogen Mustard CompoundsPolicySoilUnited States4-((2-chloroethyl)(2-mesyloxyethyl)amino)benzoylglutamic acidGlutamatesNitrogen Mustard CompoundsSoilBarriersFacilitatorsHealth policyImplementation scienceMass drug administrationNeglected tropical diseasesPolicy guidelinesSoil-transmitted helminths

Identifiers

PMID36461087
PMCPMC9716752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.