Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461058›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Relationships between biological age, distance from aquatic habitats and pyrethroid resistance status of Anopheles funestus mosquitoes in south-eastern Tanzania.

Polius G Pinda, Dickson S Msaky, Letus L Muyaga, Issa H Mshani, Rukiyah M Njalambaha, Japhet Kihonda, Hamis Bwanaly, Halfan S Ngowo, Emmanuel W Kaindoa, Lizette L Koekemoer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Polius G PindaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania. ppinda@ihi.or.tz.
Dickson S MsakyEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Letus L MuyagaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Issa H MshaniEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Rukiyah M NjalambahaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Japhet KihondaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Hamis BwanalyEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Halfan S NgowoEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Emmanuel W KaindoaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Lizette L KoekemoerWits Research Institute for Malaria, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Fredros O OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania. fredros@ihi.or.tz.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology · TZUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

DST/NRF South African Research Chairs Initiative Grant UID 64763Howard Hughes International Scholarship OPP1099295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria transmission can be highly heterogeneous between and within localities, and is influenced by factors such as survival and biting frequencies of Anopheles mosquitoes. This study investigated the relationships between the biological age, distance from aquatic habitats and pyrethroid resistance status of Anopheles funestus mosquitoes, which currently dominate malaria transmission in south-east Tanzania. The study also examined how such relationships may influence malaria transmission and control.

methodsFemale An. funestus were collected in houses located 50-100 m, 150-200 m or over 200 m from the nearest known aquatic habitats. The mosquitoes were exposed to 1×, 5× and 10× the diagnostic doses of deltamethrin or permethrin, or to the synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO) followed by the pyrethroids, then monitored for 24 h-mortality. Ovaries of exposed and non-exposed mosquitoes were dissected to assess parity as a proxy for biological age. Adults emerging from larval collections in the same villages were tested against the same insecticides at 3-5, 8-11 or 17-20 days old.

findingsMosquitoes collected nearest to the aquatic habitats (50-100 m) had the lowest mortalities compared to other distances, with a maximum of 51% mortality at 10× permethrin. For the age-synchronized mosquitoes collected as larvae, the insecticide-induced mortality assessed at both the diagnostic and multiplicative doses (1×, 5× and 10×) increased with mosquito age. The highest mortalities at 1× doses were observed among the oldest mosquitoes (17-20 days). At 10× doses, mortalities were 99% (permethrin) and 76% (deltamethrin) among 8-11 day-olds compared to 80% (permethrin) and 58% (deltamethrin) among 3-5 day-olds. Pre-exposure to PBO increased the potency of both pyrethroids. The proportion of parous females was highest among mosquitoes collected farthest from the habitats.

conclusionIn this specific setting, older An. funestus and those collected farthest from the aquatic habitats (near the centre of the village) were more susceptible to pyrethroids than the younger ones and those caught nearest to the habitats. These findings suggest that pyrethroid-based interventions may remain at least moderately effective despite widespread pyrethroid-resistance, by killing the older, less-resistant and potentially-infective mosquitoes. Further studies should investigate how and whether these observations could be exploited to optimize malaria control in different settings.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesAdultAgingAnimalsEcosystemFemaleHumansLarvaNitrilesPermethrinPyrethrinsTanzaniadecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPermethrinPyrethrinsAge gradingAnopheles funestusAquatic habitatsInsecticide resistanceMalariaMosquito ageParityPiperonyl butoxide

Identifiers

PMID36461058
PMCPMC9719249
OpenAlexW4310576938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.