Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36461001›Full record

SynthesisBMC women's health2022

Barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening services in low-and-middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Z Petersen, A Jaca, T G Ginindza, G Maseko, S Takatshana, P Ndlovu, N Zondi, N Zungu, C Varghese, G Hunting and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07211204 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Study To Compare The Efficacy Of Cervical Cytology With Molecular Screening In The Detection Of Reactive Cellular Changes In The Cervix In An Open Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorTimser SAPI de CVRan2026 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsAtypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance, ASC-US, Atypical Glandular Cells of Uncertain Significance, AGUSArmsPhysical examination, Liquid-based cytology, Molecular screening, HPV DNA test, Colposcopy
NCT07480902 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Study To Compare The Efficacy Of Cervical Cytology With Molecular Screening For Detecting Reactive Cellular Changes In The Cervix In An Open Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorTimser SAPI de CVRan2026 to 2026Enrolled558ConditionsI) Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US), II) Atypical Glandular Cells of Uncertain Significance (AGUS), III) Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN), CIN-1, CIN-2, CIN-3, IV) Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL)ArmsPhysical examination, Liquid-based cytology, Molecular screening, HPV DNA test, Colposcopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Z PetersenHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
A JacaCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
T G GinindzaPublic Health Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban, South Africa.
G MasekoHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
S TakatshanaHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
P NdlovuHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
N ZondiHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
N ZunguHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
C VargheseCervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
G HuntingCervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
G ParhamCervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
P SimelelaCervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
S MoyoHuman & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa. smoyo@hsrc.ac.za.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLow-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer mortality. We aimed to identify what is currently known about barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in LMICs and propose remedial actions.

designThis was a systematic review using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms in Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We also contacted medical associations and universities for grey literature and checked reference lists of eligible articles for relevant literature published in English between 2010 and 2020. We summarized the findings using a descriptive narrative based on themes identified as levels of the social ecological model.

settingWe included studies conducted in LMICs published in English between 2010 and 2020.

participantsWe included studies that reported on barriers to cervical cancer screening among women 15 years and older, eligible for cervical cancer screening.

resultsSeventy-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified individual, cultural/traditional and religious, societal, health system, and structural barriers to screening. Lack of knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer in general and of screening were the most frequent individual level barriers. Cultural/traditional and religious barriers included prohibition of screening and unsupportive partners and families, while social barriers were largely driven by community misconceptions. Health system barriers included policy and programmatic factors, and structural barriers were related to geography, education and cost. Underlying reasons for these barriers included limited information about cervical cancer and screening as a preventive strategy, poorly resourced health systems that lacked policies or implemented them poorly, generalised limited access to health services, and gender norms that deprioritize the health needs of women.

conclusionA wide range of barriers to screening were identified across most LMICs. Urgent implementation of clear policies supported by health system capacity for implementation, community wide advocacy and information dissemination, strengthening of policies that support women's health and gender equality, and targeted further research are needed to effectively address the inequitable burden of cervical cancer in LMICs.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansIncomePovertyCervical cancerLow-and-middle-income countriesScreeningSocial ecological model

Identifiers

PMID36461001
PMCPMC9716693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.