Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460983›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2022

Effects of eptinezumab on self-reported work productivity in adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failure in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled DELIVER study.

Piero Barbanti, Peter J Goadsby, Giorgio Lambru, Anders Ettrup, Cecilie Laurberg Christoffersen, Mette Krog Josiassen, Ravinder Phul, Bjørn Sperling

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04418765 (Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04418765 phase3completednot on this map

Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments

TypeinterventionalSponsorH. Lundbeck A/SRan2020 to 2022Enrolled892ConditionsMigraineArmsEptinezumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Psychopathological variables in chronic migraine patients with different therapeutic approach: psychological profile differences and impact on therapeutic efficacy in real life.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Piero BarbantiHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy. piero.barbanti@sanraffaele.it.
Peter J GoadsbyNIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, & Headache Group, King's College London, London, UK.
Giorgio LambruThe Headache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anders EttrupH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cecilie Laurberg ChristoffersenH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette Krog JosiassenH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ravinder PhulH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bjørn SperlingH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleKing's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multinational phase 3b DELIVER trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with prior preventive treatment failures across 17 countries. In the placebo-controlled portion, eptinezumab relative to placebo demonstrated greater reductions in migraine and headache frequency, migraine and headache severity, and acute medication use. The objective of this report is to describe the effects of eptinezumab on self-reported work productivity in the placebo-controlled portion of DELIVER.

methodsAdults 18-75 years of age with migraine and documented evidence of 2 to 4 prior preventive treatment failures in the past 10 years were randomized to receive eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo intravenously (IV) every 12 weeks. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire specific to migraine (WPAI:M), which comprises 6 items (4 of which are completed by currently employed patients only), was administered every 4 weeks. Changes from baseline in subscores (absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment) were calculated based on item responses. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze changes from baseline in WPAI:M subscores.

resultsA total of 890 adults (mean age, 43.8 years) were included in the full analysis set (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 299; eptinezumab 300 mg, n = 293; placebo, n = 298). Mean WPAI:M subscores at baseline indicated a negative impact of migraine attacks on work productivity and ability to complete normal daily activities. Eptinezumab improved WPAI:M subscores more than placebo at all assessment points throughout the study. Mean changes from baseline in self-reported work productivity loss were -19.5, -24.0, and -9.7 at Week 12; and -22.6, -20.2, and -7.2 at Week 24 (all P < 0.001 vs placebo) for eptinezumab 100 mg, eptinezumab 300 mg, and placebo, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in activity impairment were -21.3, -23.8, and -11.2 at Week 12; and -24.7, -22.6, and -10.1 at Week 24 (all P < 0.0001 vs placebo). Similarly, mean improvements in absenteeism and presenteeism were greater in the eptinezumab groups than in the groups receiving placebo at all timepoints (P < 0.05).

conclusionIn adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failure, eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg IV every 12 weeks improved absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment more than placebo.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765 ); EudraCT (Identifier: 2019-004497-25) ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-004497-25/PL ). Eptinezumab improves self-reported work productivity in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHeadacheHumansMiddle AgedSelf ReportTreatment FailureYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedeptinezumab

Identifiers

PMID36460983
PMCPMC9716694
OpenAlexW4311102997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.