Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460964›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

A multisource approach to health care use: concordance between register and self-reported physician visits in the foreign-born population in Finland.

Regina García-Velázquez, Valentina Kieseppä, Eero Lilja, Päivikki Koponen, Natalia Skogberg, Hannamaria Kuusio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Regina García-VelázquezFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, PL/PB/P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland. regina.garcia.velazquez@thl.fi.
Valentina KieseppäFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, PL/PB/P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Eero LiljaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, PL/PB/P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivikki KoponenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, PL/PB/P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Natalia SkogbergFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, PL/PB/P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Hannamaria KuusioFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, PL/PB/P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund FinMonik2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable information on the use of health services is important for health care planning, monitoring and policy. It is critical to assess the validity of the sources used for this purpose, including register and survey-based data. Studies on foreign-born populations' health care use have usually implemented either survey or register data. The concordance of such data among groups of different cultural background remains largely unknown. In this study, we presented an approach to examine routinely how survey and register-related characteristics may explain disagreement found between the two information sources.

methodsWe linked register- and survey-based data pertaining to the Finnish Register of Primary Health Care general physician visits and the Survey on Well-Being among Foreign Born Population (FinMonik, 2018-2019), a nationally representative survey. The sample comprised n = 5,800 informants for whom registered general physician visits were tracked in the 12-month period preceding their participation in the survey. Cohen's kappa was used as measure of multisource concordance, hierarchical loglinear models for the association between single predictors and multisource discrepancy, and a logistic regression model for examining source-related predictors of source discrepancy. Survey weights were used in all sample analyses.

resultsSource concordance was poor. When dichotomizing general physician visits (zero vs one or more), 35% of informants had reported one or more visits while none were found from register. Both register- and informant-related predictors were associated to this discrepancy (i.e. catchment area, private health care use, inability to work, region of origin and reason for migration).

conclusionsWe found high discrepancy between the reported and the registered physician visits among the foreign-born population in Finland, with a particularly high number of reported physician visits when none were found in the register. There was a strong association between the specific catchment area and mismatch, indicating that both register under-coverage and survey over-report are plausible and may coexist behind the discrepancy. However, associations of informant's characteristics and mismatch were less pronounced. Implications on the validity of medical information sources are discussed.

Indexed as

General PractitionersInternationalityDelivery of Health CareFinlandHumansSelf ReportForeign-born populationHealth care useRegistersSurvey methodsValidity

Identifiers

PMID36460964
PMCPMC9717412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.