ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2023
Automated dynamic motion correction improves repeatability and reproducibility of myocardial blood flow quantification with rubidium-82 PET imaging.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic motion correction for myocardial blood flow estimation improves diagnostic performance for coronary artery disease inJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025Trial
- The Effect of Motion Correction on Quantitative Perfusion Indices and Threshold-Based Interpretation inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dynamic frame-by-frame motion correction forEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Motion Correction Algorithm: Validation in [Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of fast vs. slow rubidium-82 infusion profile on precision and accuracy of PET myocardial blood flow perfusion metrics using a 1-tissue compartment model.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Inter-Software Reproducibility of Quantitative Values of Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Acquired by [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamicJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient motion reduces the accuracy of PET myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements. This study evaluated the effect of automatic motion correction on test-retest repeatability and inter-observer variability in a clinically relevant population.
methodsPatients with known or suspected CAD underwent repeat rest
results140 pairs of test-retest scans were included, with visual motion noted in 18%. Motion correction decreased the global MBF values by 3.5% (0.80 ± 0.24 vs 0.82 ± 0.25 mL⋅min
conclusionAutomatic motion correction improved test-retest repeatability and reduced differences between observers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36460862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.