Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460848›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Drawing: A Dialogue across Disciplines.

Jenny Wright, Neil Shah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenny WrightDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK. jenwright17@aol.com.
Neil ShahDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen's Hospital, Romford, Essex, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many examples of a cross pollination between those involved in the arts and in the field of health care. This fruitful dialogue has resulted in the production of impressive artwork across many genres and given opportunities for the development of collaborative projects. Although advanced technologies have become more prevalent in clinics, wards and operating theatres, drawing activities continue to be a significant means of recording observations, communication and planning as well as a methodology for teaching and learning. Interdisciplinary creative projects reveal the continued importance of drawing as a central, primal activity both as part of a purposeful dialogue and also as a useful tool to encourage active participation in teaching and learning. Other studies continue to show drawing activities to be an excellent tool for developing skills in observation and communication, useful for improving the physical and psychological support for individual patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationLearningFruitHospitalsHumansOperating RoomsAnatomyDrawingInterdisciplinary dialogueMedical educationOral and maxillofacial surgeryProfessional developmentSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.