Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460829›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2022

Quality and utility of YouTube videos about mPCNL.

Mehmet Yilmaz, Yusuf Sahin, Ibrahim Hacibey, Salih Zeki Sonmez, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet YilmazDepartment of Urology, Merkez Mahallesi, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi University of Health Sciences Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Bagcilar, 34200, Istanbul, Turkey. drmehmetyilmaz@yandex.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5780-534X
Yusuf SahinDepartment of Urology, Merkez Mahallesi, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi University of Health Sciences Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Bagcilar, 34200, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ibrahim HacibeyDepartment of Urology, Merkez Mahallesi, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi University of Health Sciences Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Bagcilar, 34200, Istanbul, Turkey.
Salih Zeki SonmezDepartment of Urology, Merkez Mahallesi, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi University of Health Sciences Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Bagcilar, 34200, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Yaser MuslumanogluDepartment of Urology, Merkez Mahallesi, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi University of Health Sciences Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Bagcilar, 34200, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the reliability, efficacy, and quality of YouTube videos on miniaturized PCNL procedures using a scoring system. Video searches were conducted using the keywords miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL), ultra-mini-PCNL (UMP), and super-mini-PCNL (SMP) via https://www.youtube.com . All videos > 2 min in English containing the procedure of mPCNL were ordered and listed according to relevance and popularity. Global quality scores (GQS) and reliability scales were used for quality and content analysis of the videos. The confirmed video power index (VPI) was used to assess video popularity, and the mPCNL score, developed by three endourologists, was used to measure the informational and educational value of the videos. While specialists (61.9%) were the main source for uploading 63 videos included in the study, the largest target group was patients (61.9%). Operational procedures (68.3%) were the main content, and the highest upload region was Asian continent (66.7%). The majority of videos were in English (60.3%), focused on standard mPCNL rather than miniaturization subtypes (77.8%). The mean VPI, GQS, reliability, and mPCNL scores were 4.61, 2.86, 2.61, 9.58, respectively. These parameters, which were positively correlated, were found to be statistically significantly higher for videos of 'academic' origin, 'Physicians' target audience and 'English audio' language format (p < 0.05). Because mPCNL videos, which are popular and have high informational and educational value, are aimed at medical professionals rather than patients, they are not functional in treatment selection and explaining the procedure. By raising its standards, video portals can make the treatment process practical as a functional bridge between patients and health care professionals.

Indexed as

Nephrolithotomy, PercutaneousSocial MediaAsian PeopleHumansMiniaturizationReproducibility of ResultsEducational surgery videoKidney stonesMiniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomyYouTube

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.