Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460781›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evidence to support the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping at low force levels.

Banuvathy Rajakumar, S K M Varadhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Banuvathy RajakumarDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.
S K M VaradhanDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India. skm@iitm.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-5746-2340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasping an object is one of the several tasks performed by human hands. Object stabilization while grasping is a fundamental aspect to consider for the safety of grasped objects. Fingertip forces re-distribute to establish equilibrium when systematic variations are introduced to objects held in hand. During torque variations to the grasped handle, the central nervous system prefers to support the mechanical advantage hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arm for normal force produce greater normal force than the fingers with shorter moment arm. The current study was performed to examine and confirm the factor that causes the central nervous system to employ this strategy. In addition to minimising the thumb's contribution to hold the handle, thumb normal force was restricted to a minimal level. Such a restriction made the task even more challenging. Therefore, it was confirmed that the challenging task induces the central nervous system to employ the mechanical advantage principle.

Indexed as

FingersHandHumansThumbTorqueUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID36460781
PMCPMC9718759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.