Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460734›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2024

The impact of locoregional treatments for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer on disease progression: real life experience from a multicenter cohort.

Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Francesco Prata, Riccardo Mastroianni, Cosimo De Nunzio, Giorgia Tema, Gabriele Tuderti, Alfredo Maria Bove, Umberto Anceschi, Aldo Brassetti, Leonardo Misuraca and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariaconsiglia FerrieroIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy. marilia.ferriero@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5188-8001
Francesco PrataFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-6210
Riccardo MastroianniIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Cosimo De NunzioFaculty of Health Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2190-512X
Giorgia TemaFaculty of Health Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele TudertiIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Alfredo Maria BoveIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5139-9993
Umberto AnceschiIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Aldo BrassettiIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9643-8979
Leonardo MisuracaIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Silvana GiacintiFaculty of Health Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Fabio CalabròSan Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore GuaglianoneIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Andrea TubaroFaculty of Health Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Rocco PapaliaFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Costantino Leonardo"Sapienza" University, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Michele Gallucci"Sapienza" University, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SimoneIRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-9025
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITCampus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITNational Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailable data on medical treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) support the use of more than one therapy line to delay chemotherapy. We evaluate in a longitudinal real life multicenter cohort, the oncological outcome of mCRPC patients treated with Abiraterone Acetate (AA) and Enzalutamide (EZ) in a chemo-naïve setting, who received locoregional treatments for subsequent development of oligorecurrent disease.

methodsWe prospectively collected data on chemo-naïve mCRPC patients, who received either AA or EZ as first or second line treatment between Oct-2012 and Nov-2020 at 5 centers. High-volume disease at mCRPC onset was defined as bulky positive nodes (≥5 cm) or more than 6 bone metastases. Survival probabilities were computed at 12, 24, 48 and 60 months after treatment start. The impact of loco-regional treatments on progression free survival (PFS) were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was applied.

resultsOverall, 117 chemo-naive mCRPC patients received a first line therapy. Fifty-seven (48.7%) patients received AA and 60 (51.3%) received EZ. Eight (6.7%) patients underwent salvage chemotherapy after first line failure. Overall, 28 patients shifted to a second line therapy. Two-yr progression-free, cancer-specific and overall survival probabilities were 65.5%, 82.2% and 78.4% respectively. Since diagnosis of mCRPC, oligo progression occurred in 25 patients who received stereotactic radiation therapy (23/25, 92%) focused on metastasis (4 nodal sites and 19 bones) or salvage lymph node dissection (2/25, 8%). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with low volume disease displayed higher PFS probabilities (log rank p = 0.009) and in this subgroup of patients loco-regional treatments had a significant impact on PFS (p = 0.048), while it was negligible in the whole cohort and in patients with high volume disease (p = 0.6 and p = 0.75).

conclusionsLow-volume mCRPC patients are exposed to improved PFS and seem to benefit from locoregional treatments.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAbiraterone AcetateDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNitrilesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAbiraterone AcetateNitriles

Identifiers

PMID36460734
OpenAlexW4310643736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.