Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evolutionarily conserved gene expression patterns for affective disorders revealed using cross-species brain transcriptomic analyses in humans, rats and zebrafish.

Konstantin A Demin, Nataliya A Krotova, Nikita P Ilyin, David S Galstyan, Tatyana O Kolesnikova, Tatyana Strekalova, Murilo S de Abreu, Elena V Petersen, Konstantin N Zabegalov, Allan V Kalueff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current State of Modeling Human Psychiatric Disorders Using Zebrafish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Konstantin A DeminAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russia. deminkasci@gmail.com.
Nataliya A KrotovaAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Nikita P IlyinAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russia.
David S GalstyanInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Tatyana O KolesnikovaNeurobiology Program, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia.
Tatyana StrekalovaUniversity of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Murilo S de AbreuMoscow Institute of Physics and Technologies, Moscow, Russia.
Elena V PetersenMoscow Institute of Physics and Technologies, Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin N ZabegalovNeurobiology Program, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia.
Allan V KalueffLaboratory of Preclinical Bioscreening, Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Pesochny, Russia. avkalueff@gmail.com.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUSirius University of Science and Technology · RUMaastricht University · NLRussian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread, debilitating and often treatment-resistant, depression and other stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders represent an urgent unmet biomedical and societal problem. Although animal models of these disorders are commonly used to study stress pathogenesis, they are often difficult to translate across species into valuable and meaningful clinically relevant data. To address this problem, here we utilized several cross-species/cross-taxon approaches to identify potential evolutionarily conserved differentially expressed genes and their sets. We also assessed enrichment of these genes for transcription factors DNA-binding sites down- and up- stream from their genetic sequences. For this, we compared our own RNA-seq brain transcriptomic data obtained from chronically stressed rats and zebrafish with publicly available human transcriptomic data for patients with major depression and their respective healthy control groups. Utilizing these data from the three species, we next analyzed their differential gene expression, gene set enrichment and protein-protein interaction networks, combined with validated tools for data pooling. This approach allowed us to identify several key brain proteins (GRIA1, DLG1, CDH1, THRB, PLCG2, NGEF, IKZF1 and FEZF2) as promising, evolutionarily conserved and shared affective 'hub' protein targets, as well as to propose a novel gene set that may be used to further study affective pathogenesis. Overall, these approaches may advance cross-species brain transcriptomic analyses, and call for further cross-species studies into putative shared molecular mechanisms of affective pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderZebrafishAnimalsBrainHumansMood DisordersRatsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID36460699
PMCPMC9718822
OpenAlexW4311113863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.