Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460688›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Multi-proxy dentition analyses reveal niche partitioning between sympatric herbivorous dinosaurs.

Attila Ősi, Paul M Barrett, Alistair R Evans, András Lajos Nagy, Imre Szenti, Ákos Kukovecz, János Magyar, Martin Segesdi, Kinga Gere, Viviána Jó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Attila ŐsiDepartment of Palaeontology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. osi.attila@ttk.elte.hu.
Paul M BarrettNatural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Alistair R EvansMonash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
András Lajos NagyDepartment of Propulsion Technology HU, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, Győr, 9026, Hungary.
Imre SzentiDepartment of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, Interdisciplinary Centre of Excellence, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, Szeged, 6720, Hungary.
Ákos KukoveczDepartment of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, Interdisciplinary Centre of Excellence, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, Szeged, 6720, Hungary.
János MagyarDepartment of Palaeontology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Martin SegesdiDepartment of Palaeontology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Kinga GereDepartment of Palaeontology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Viviána JóDepartment of Physical Geography, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dentitions of the sympatric herbivorous dinosaurs Hungarosaurus (Ankylosauria, Nodosauridae) and Mochlodon (Ornithopoda, Rhabdodontidae) (Santonian, Hungary) were analysed to investigate their dietary ecology, using several complementary methods-orientation patch count, tooth replacement rate, macrowear, tooth wear rate, traditional microwear, and dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA). Tooth formation time is similar in Hungarosaurus and Mochlodon, and traditional and DMTA microwear features suggest low-browsing habits for both taxa, consistent with their inferred stances and body sizes. However, Mochlodon possesses a novel adaptation for increasing dental durability: the dentine on the working side of the crown is double the thickness of that on the balancing side. Moreover, crown morphology, enamel thickness, macrowear orientation, and wear rate differ greatly between the two taxa. Consequently, these sympatric herbivores probably exploited plants of different toughness, implying dietary selectivity and niche partitioning. Hungarosaurus is inferred to have eaten softer vegetation, whereas Mochlodon likely fed on tougher material. Compared to the much heavier, quadrupedal Hungarosaurus, the bipedal Mochlodon wore down more than twice as much of its crown volume during the functional life of the tooth. This heavy tooth wear might correlate with more intensive food processing and, in turn, could reflect differences in the metabolic requirements of these animals.

Indexed as

DinosaursTooth WearAnimalsDentitionHerbivorySympatry

Identifiers

PMID36460688
PMCPMC9718793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.