Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460632›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Dynamic spatiotemporal determinants modulate GPCR:G protein coupling selectivity and promiscuity.

Manbir Sandhu, Aaron Cho, Ning Ma, Elizaveta Mukhaleva, Yoon Namkung, Sangbae Lee, Soumadwip Ghosh, John H Lee, David E Gloriam, Stéphane A Laporte and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of the tryptophan-rich allosteric network and sodium egress in GPCR activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Structural Basis of GPCR-Biased Modulation.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  10. Structural insights into the G-protein subtype selectivity revealed by human sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 3-GProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Dissociation kinetics of G proteins from G protein-coupled receptors and effects of allosteric modulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Conformational Signatures of Preassembled and Active Complexes of 5-HTJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  13. Serotonin 5-HTACS chemical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Loss-of-function GαScience signaling · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An atomic look at the interface of GHSR and its partners.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  19. BaNDyT: Bayesian Network modeling of molecular Dynamics Trajectories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Manbir SandhuDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. msandhu@stjude.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-7268
Aaron ChoDepartment of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Ning MaDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Elizaveta MukhalevaDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Yoon NamkungDepartment of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3085-2066
Sangbae LeeDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Soumadwip GhoshDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
John H LeeDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
David E GloriamDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-7561
Stéphane A LaporteDepartment of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0633-543X
M Madan BabuDepartment of Structural Biology, Center for Data Driven Discovery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. madan.babu@stjude.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0556-6196
Nagarajan VaidehiDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. NVaidehi@coh.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8100-8132
City of Hope · USMcGill University Health Centre · CASt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Structural dynamics underlying GPCR-G protein selectivityR01GM117923 · NIGMS · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI VAIDEHI, NAGARAJAN · 2017 to 2024
$3.8M
Computationally Guided Design of Thermostable mutants of Neurotensin receptor1R01GM097261 · NIGMS · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI VAIDEHI, NAGARAJAN · 2011 to 2018
$2.3M
An integrated toolkit combining computational systems biology techniques with molecular dynamics simulations to delineate functionality of GPCRsR01LM013876 · NLM · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI RODIN, ANDREI, VAIDEHI, NAGARAJAN · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097261NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117923NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) show selective and promiscuous coupling to different Gα protein subfamilies and yet the mechanisms of the range of coupling preferences remain unclear. Here, we use Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations on ten GPCR:G protein complexes and show that the location (spatial) and duration (temporal) of intermolecular contacts at the GPCR:Gα protein interface play a critical role in how GPCRs selectively interact with G proteins. We identify that some GPCR:G protein interface contacts are common across Gα subfamilies and others specific to Gα subfamilies. Using large scale data analysis techniques on the MD simulation snapshots we derive a spatio-temporal code for contacts that confer G protein selective coupling and validated these contacts using G protein activation BRET assays. Our results demonstrate that promiscuous GPCRs show persistent sampling of the common contacts more than G protein specific contacts. These findings suggest that GPCRs maintain contact with G proteins through a common central interface, while the selectivity comes from G protein specific contacts at the periphery of the interface.

Indexed as

Biological AssayMolecular Dynamics SimulationResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID36460632
PMCPMC9718833
OpenAlexW4310540339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.