ArticleFertility and sterility2023
Markers of ovarian reserve as predictors of future fertility.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular mechanisms of folliculogenesis and oogenesis.Systems biology in reproductive medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of ovarian reserve markers on oocyte maturity and embryological outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: A retrospective cohort study.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- A multi-model study of the association between BMI and AMH in Chinese women.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Anti-Müllerian hormone and somatic ovarian function: a new perspective.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Long-term sucralose exposure accelerates ovarian aging via gut microbiota dysbiosis.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- HPA/HPG axes dysfunction: assessing the interrelations between diminished ovarian reserve and mental health.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- A Clinically Applicable Nomogram for Live Birth Prediction After IVF: The Zubeyde Hanim Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of the interaction between ovarian markers and the endometrium on the outcomes of assisted reproduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Endocrine disorders following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a comprehensive systematic review.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2026Article
- Hyperresponse during ovarian stimulation despite profoundly suppressed ovarian reserve markers in a patient with long-term combined hormonal contraceptive use.F&S reports · 2025Article
- The Final Phases of Ovarian Aging: A Tale of Diverging Functional Trajectories.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Association of relative fat mass with female infertility: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2017-2020.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive value of AMH in late reproductive age: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evidence on Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels and Endometriosis Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- 4D quantitative proteomics of ovarian granulosa cells reveals the involvement of oxidative phosphorylation in non-elderly women with diminished ovarian reserve.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- The role of Chinese herbal medicine in diminished ovarian reserve management.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- The relevance of female overweight in infertility treatment: a position statement of the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Chlorogenic Acid Ameliorates Chronic Unpredictable Stress-Induced Diminished Ovarian Reserve Through Ovarian Renin-Angiotensin System.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2025Article
- B cell translocation gene 2 expression levels in human granulosa cells is negatively associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a pilot study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Association between combined healthy lifestyles and infertility: a cross-sectional study in US reproductive-aged women.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the association between ovarian reserve biomarkers and future fertility among late reproductive-age women.
designCohort study of participants enrolled in Time to Conceive (TTC), a time-to-pregnancy cohort study of the ovarian reserve biomarkers.
settingCommunity. PATIENT(S): Women aged 30-44 years without a history of infertility who provided a blood sample at enrollment in TTC and who agreed to future follow-up. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were probability of achieving a live birth >3 years after enrollment in TTC, diagnosis of infertility at any time, and time-to-pregnancy in future pregnancy attempts. RESULT(S): Women with diminished ovarian reserve, defined as those with an antimüllerian hormone (AMH) level <0.7 ng/mL or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level ≥10 mIU/mL, did not have low risk of future live birth (relative risk [RR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.83 and RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97-1.70, respectively) compared with women with normal ovarian reserve after adjusting for age at blood draw, race, obesity, use of hormonal contraception, and year of enrollment in original study. Among women in the cohort that attempted to conceive, there was not a significant association between diminished ovarian reserve, as measured by AMH or FSH, and risk of future infertility (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.21-2.07 and RR,1.69; 95% CI, 0.86-3.31, respectively). Similarly, there was no association between AMH and FSH levels and future fecundability (fecundability ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.60; and fecundability ration, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.55-1.36, respectively).
conclusionDiminished ovarian reserve is not associated with reduced future reproductive capacity. Given the lack of association, women should be cautioned regarding use biomarkers of ovarian reserve as predictors of their future reproductive capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.