Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36460252›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2023

Morphological and functional findings in COVID-19 lung disease as compared to Pneumonia, ARDS, and High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema.

Gustavo R Zubieta-Calleja, Natalia Zubieta-DeUrioste, Felipe de Jesús Montelongo, Manuel Gabriel Romo Sanchez, Aurio Fajardo Campoverdi, Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco, Denise Battaglini, Lorenzo Ball, Paolo Pelosi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Altitude and case fatality rate from COVID-19 during the pandemic in Peru, 2020-2022.Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Gustavo R Zubieta-CallejaHigh Altitude Pulmonary and Pathology Institute (HAPPI - IPPA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Natalia Zubieta-DeUriosteHigh Altitude Pulmonary and Pathology Institute (HAPPI - IPPA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Felipe de Jesús MontelongoCritical and Neurointensive Care Unit and Pathology Department, Hospital General de Ecatepec "Las Américas", Instituto de Salud del Estado de México, México.
Manuel Gabriel Romo SanchezCritical and Neurointensive Care Unit and Pathology Department, Hospital General de Ecatepec "Las Américas", Instituto de Salud del Estado de México, México.
Aurio Fajardo CampoverdiCritical Care Unit, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Patricia Rieken Macedo RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; COVID-19 Virus Network, Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Brasilia, Brazil.
Denise BattagliniAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy. Electronic address: battaglini.denise@gmail.com.
Lorenzo BallAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Paolo PelosiAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Instituto de Salud del Estado de México · MXOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITMinistry of Science, Technology and Innovation · BRUniversity of Genoa · ITViña del Mar University · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) may severely affect respiratory function and evolve to life-threatening hypoxia. The clinical experience led to the implementation of standardized protocols assuming similarity to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2). Understanding the histopathological and functional patterns is essential to better understand the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and then develop new therapeutic strategies. Epithelial and endothelial cell damage can result from the virus attack, thus leading to immune-mediated response. Pulmonary histopathological findings show the presence of Mallory bodies, alveolar coating cells with nuclear atypia, reactive pneumocytes, reparative fibrosis, intra-alveolar hemorrhage, moderate inflammatory infiltrates, micro-abscesses, microthrombus, hyaline membrane fragments, and emphysema-like lung areas. COVID-19 patients may present different respiratory stages from silent to critical hypoxemia, are associated with the degree of pulmonary parenchymal involvement, thus yielding alteration of ventilation and perfusion relationships. This review aims to: discuss the morphological (histopathological and radiological) and functional findings of COVID-19 compared to acute interstitial pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), four entities that share common clinical traits, but have peculiar pathophysiological features with potential implications to their clinical management.

Indexed as

COVID-19PneumoniaPulmonary EdemaRespiratory Distress SyndromeAltitudeAltitude SicknessHumansHypertension, PulmonarySARS-CoV-2ARDSCOVID-19HAPELung sequelaeSARS-CoV-2Viral pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID36460252
PMCPMC9707029
OpenAlexW4310353931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.