Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36459554›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

DNA origami-based artificial antigen-presenting cells for adoptive T cell therapy.

Yueyang Sun, Jiajia Sun, Mingshu Xiao, Wei Lai, Li Li, Chunhai Fan, Hao Pei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Programmable DNA Logic Systems for Applications in Biomedicine.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Biomaterials of different sizes for enhanced adoptive cell transfer therapy in solid tumors].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bottom-up synthetic immunology.Nature nanotechnology · 2024
    Review
  20. Fluidic Interface for Surface-based DNA Origami Studies.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yueyang SunShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Genome Editing and Cell Therapy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3983-4753
Jiajia SunShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Genome Editing and Cell Therapy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.
Mingshu XiaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Genome Editing and Cell Therapy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0673-1544
Wei LaiShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Genome Editing and Cell Therapy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-0667
Li LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Genome Editing and Cell Therapy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-4997
Chunhai FanSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Institute of Molecular Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7171-7338
Hao PeiShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Genome Editing and Cell Therapy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-6708
East China Normal University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanosized artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPCs) with efficient signal presentation hold great promise for in vivo adoptive cell therapy. Here, we used DNA origami nanostructures as two-dimensional scaffolds to regulate the spatial presentation of activating ligands at nanoscale to construct high-effective aAPCs. The DNA origami-based aAPC comprises costimulatory ligands anti-CD28 antibody anchored at three vertices and T cell receptor (TCR) ligands peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) anchored at three edges with varying density. The DNA origami scaffold enables quantitative analysis of ligand-receptor interactions in T cell activation at the single-particle, single-molecule resolution. The pMHC-TCR-binding dwell time is increased from 9.9 to 12.1 s with increasing pMHC density, driving functional T cell responses. In addition, both in vitro and in vivo assays demonstrate that the optimized DNA origami-based aAPCs show effective tumor growth inhibiting capability in adoptive immunotherapy. These results provide important insights into the rational design of molecular vaccines for cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Antigen-Presenting CellsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDNALymphocyte ActivationDNA

Identifiers

PMID36459554
PMCPMC10936057
OpenAlexW4310774252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.